10-10-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

«9-3f1i Jtif a3«s Pm Applfirtta S*1MS Dm CuPiirii m CiapPHi S-IMf laMiliMliqrPavlNrPirWttplm: 7.|7^ M-4>iyll*m«NrmC>lMMM7.#4S»: %15-m To: frmi Choir Rihn and Planning CommMon Membot Ron Moone, City Adminiitrator ^ Miko Otfhon. Planning Director Janict Oiindlaeh, City Pluintryi Dotr Snhicct: July 14.300S 05*3121« Cindy Sudheimer and Jamca Andersl on behalf of the Narrows Saloon, 3312 Shoreline Drive. Conditional Use Permit Amendment Revised Proposal - Continue Public Hearing Zan ing Distfkt: Lot Area: Lot Width: B - 1. Retail Sales BusHiesa District (20,000 s.f. minimum) 0.31 acres (13.6S6s.f.) 112 liKt(100* required) UstofKshlMli Exhibit A - Revised Plana Exhibit D - Notice of Planning Commitiioo Action dated 7-5-05 Exhibit C - Letter from Bradley Hoyt 7 21-OS Exhibit D > Staff Response Letter dated 7-6-05 Exhibit E - Letter from Sera MarMd dated 7-22-OS Exhibit F-Letter fVom Chuck Nadkr received 7-14-OS Exhibit Q - Letter fVom Thomas Lowe dated 7-13-05 Exhibit H - Police Chief Comments dated 6-20-0S (Distributed at 6-20-0S meeting) Exhibit I - Memo and Exhibits of June 15.2005 Exhibit J - OraO Planning Coramiaaion Minutes of 6-20-05 Meeting EeWsed AppIkMhm Smummrf: Applicant requests the following in order to expend the existing Class 11 bai/rtsiaunnt into the spaces currently occupied by the dry cleaner and Jul Ann Hair Fiiliions, to pennit an interior kitchen expansion, a^ to pennii outdoor teraing at the front and rear of the building: 1. 3. Araandment of tht existing conditional uie pennit to allow a 50* x 44* interior expansion of the borfitsiaurant into the spaces curremty occupied by the dry elenner and Jul Ann Hair Fashions. Aracndrotm of tht cxiating cooditiocial me pennh to allow outdoor aaating at the hunt of the building atoag ShorcUne Drive adding 32 addhional mta. which woiiid raquirt that the existing sidewalk easement in favor of the City be encroached upon by approximaiely 4.5 feet. Amendment of the existing conditional use permit to allow outdoor acming at the rear of tht building, adjacent to the City owned parking lot but within the applicam*8 propeny, measuring 1,292 s.f. in arm or approximately 60 addiiioiuil ietris.2aas r*c»2«r4 (the kitchen and vestibule additions ha\^ been incorporated into the existing building, eliminating the need for front and side yard setback variances)____ Ihc Planning Commission should continue to discuss the issum railed at the June PC meeting, noted within this report and in the attached minutes; formally require that the applicant hire a consuluuil to examine the parking issues; and give clear direction to the applicant regarding what conditions would be established for the outdoor seating if permitted. Staff recommends that this application be tabled until the applicant has hired a consultant and a parking aiudy has been completed.___________________________ PROPOSED REVISIONS Rear Patio The applicanl has reduced the area containing the outdoor seating in the rear of the building from 1,666 af. to t ,292 s.f. or from 84 seats to 60 seats. The **bar station" in the previous plans has also been eliminated. This area was reduced in site by moving the eastern \vaU/Tenoe to the west by approximately 12 feet. The area remains accessible only from within the lestauranL A waitress station has been included into this area just to the caA of the entry. Lastly, the tree proposed within the screening to the north has been eliminated in an effort to not encroach on the existing overbmd utility casement The other planiings remain. Fraat Pathi The fencing formalizing the from patio area has been eliminated; however 2 additiona] teals are included in the revised plans going from 30 seats to 32 seau. The ubles are now shown aa round umbrella tables adjacent to the building, whereas the previous plans had shown tables adjacent to a propel fence. This revision actually increases the square footage along Shoreline Drive devoted to outduor sealing, in addition to adding 2 seats. The encroachment on the City's sidewalk easemcfU appears lelaiively unchanged. This increase in area requires one additional parking stall, as noted further in this report. The decorative trees within the right-of-way remain a part of the proposal and would required Hennepin County approval. Inferior Eipaaaloa Tlie applicaats have eliminated the kitchen addition, which required a side yard setback variance and ftmher cloaed-tn an already restrictive drive aisle. The revised plans show an area within the building as an option fee a kitchen expansion. This area is approxtmaiely 152 s f reducing the public floor area within the building by 152 s.f. The applkanls have also eliminaied the exterior vestibule and have incorporated an interior vcatibulc. half within the proposed main teitauram/bar wea and the ocher half within the banquet area at the western end of the building. Elimination of the vestibule eliminaied the need for a from yard setback variance, however the revised plans note an option to straighten out the fiM entry wail in the location of the previously requeued exterior vesiibuk. Should the applicants pursue straightening out this wall, a front yard setback variance would be required, ahhough the encroachment would be no more than what c\i'»H today. Elimination of kitchen and vestibule additions and incorporaiion of them