Laserfiche WebLink
- - -V, <br />1 <br />% <br />To: Qrono City Council October 6,2005 <br />Please consider this another letter opposing the Narrows Expansion (i^05-3121) <br />and in support of letters also submitted by David Haidten and Chuck Nadler, also on <br />behalf of Nei^bors for a Bettor Navarre. <br />Geaerai Phil—o«hv Cnldfaig —r OnnoiitktB to the Exaansioe <br />^Examine the City Philosi^hy listed on its website. Specifically, Joes the <br />Nam>ws Kxpunsion **prc.scr\c our distinct urhun iind riinil use patterns and lileslylcs. and <br />more Importantly, does it prescrw our UK*al character and identity'-.’? as stated in the City <br />Philosopliy? <br />Wc believe that it docs not. The Narrows has misrepresented their plan by saying <br />that the point of this expansion is primarily to increase restaurant service (July Planning <br />Minutoa). The pnqtceed layout seems to accomodate primarily an increase in music <br />patrons/bar traffic. It ia interesting to note that the site also schedules perfor mances <br />(some of them natiotial acta) nightly (except Sundays) and the noise/parking study was <br />only con ducted on a single Friday/Saturday. Finally please note diat diat Narrows is <br />•liMdv itveitiaina its outdoor seating area, prior to approval, on its website. <br />^Understanding that Navane is a small community with some families who have <br />been here for gencratiaos, and others who are attracted to the lake as relative newcomers <br />is important to make sure that the expansion of businesses here fits within the B-1 zoning. <br />As 3TOU are aware, this B>1 axming cidia for buainesaes which serve the local community. <br />Sulxnitted at the Sqpt 19*' meetii^ was apetition on behalf of th*. .nepansion with <br />approximately 50 signatures. Thlsi petition has no uddrc.s.so.s. phono numbers, etc. It i.s <br />uncleur tiuu these signatures arc from h»cul residents dirccilx' ulVceteJ by the iruHlc und <br />noise of die .suluon.. <br />* As you ate also aware, die City Council enacted a Moratorium eflective July 30, <br />2005 for 12 month s on commercial devdopment in Navarre so that a <br />oomprehenaive evaluarion and plan can be developed. According to the “Star <br />Tribime** aitiole on 10/2A)5, udiich evaluates a similar moratorium in St Paul, part <br />of the reason neighborhood associations support this type of moratorium is so ihni <br />** wc can't jiLst sweep this conversiuion under the ruy". 'I'lie "I’onvei'SiUion ” refers <br />In the pluns for a comprehensiw uppnuich to commciriul development which <br />lakes into acettunt the opinion of local residents. <br />Although the letter ofihc moniiorium may not be tipplicnole to the <br />Numrws Hspaitsion Application, the SPIRIT of the moratorium can and .should <br />be. Residents have signed a petition and have made their voices heard at the <br />meetiiigs, yet it seems to have fidlen largely upon deaf ears at the Planning level. <br />Thai^you. <br />MaraaFree.*^ <br />2914 Casco Pt Rd Orono 55391 <br />8*4 4881 XL¥ 8SB eua •>80<V0 SO 90 ao