Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />m <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING €X>MMISSION <br />Monday, September 19,2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />, V,.. <br />Kempf inquired whether that door would be used to go into the outside area from the vestibule area. <br />Jurgens stated from the standpoint of containment, a vestibule makes the most sense, and recommended <br />the qiplicants look at that option. <br />Anderst commented with the ten-foot high fence and the vestibule, tlie area should almost have a roof on <br />it. Anderst stated in his opinion the noise study should alleviate the concerns of the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Jurgens stateu they do need to listen of the concerns of the residents and encouraged the applicants to be <br />sensitive to the local residents. <br />Anderst stated they have listened to the concerns of the residents but that there does not seem to be an <br />ending to the discussion. <br />Rahn inquired whether patrons would be allowed to take drinks out on the patio after 10:00 and suggested <br />that no drinks be allowed after a certain hour as one of the conditions. <br />Sudbeimer stated they do curmtly enforce no cups be taken outside. <br />Oaflron noted a gate is proposed for the outdoor seating area and inquired what the purpose of the gate is <br />for. <br />Anderst stated it is his understanding an emergency exit must be provided. <br />Oaflron stated the building inspector would need to look at emergency access to this area. <br />Anderst stated he has looked at other seating areas and that they are not required to lock the gate. Anderst <br />stated there has to be an unlocked gate or some type of exit for the outdoor patio area. <br />Frank stated due to the number of occupants, another exit would be required. <br />Rahn stated he sees a number of building code issues with this application that will need to be addressed <br />by the applicants. <br />Frank stated they would meet the code rt^rding egr^ and ingress. <br />PAGE 16