Laserfiche WebLink
FILE i05-3104 <br />14 June 2005 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Background <br />At the April Planning Commission meeting the applicants proposed a plan which required rear <br />yard setback, lake setback, hardcover and structural coverage variances. At that time, the <br />Planning Commission tabled the application and directed the applicants to redesign within the <br />existing structural coverage level of 16%. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br />Lot Aren/Width; <br />LR-IC Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 21,780 s.r (O.Sacre)100’ <br />Actual 14,000 s.r. (0.32 acre)102 ’ <br />Setbacks: <br />LR-IC Reqoired Existine Proposed <br />Rear 30’8.S ’ detached garage 28 ’ <br />North Side 10’S’ detached garage <br />10’ house 10’ <br />South Side 10’20 ’10’ <br />Lakeshore 75’12'-ST 62 ’-51’ <br />Average Lakeshore The existing home (as weii <br />lakeshore setback <br />as the proposed additions) is behind the average <br />Structural Covciage: <br />Total Lot Area Total Stnictural Coverage <br />14,000 s.f. (0 32 acre)Allowed: 2,100 s.f. (15%) <br />Existing: 2,248 s.f. (16%) <br />Prior Proposal: 3,441 s.f. (24.5%) <br />Current Proposed: 2,930 s.f. (21%) <br />Hardcover Calculations: <br />Hardcover Total Area Allowed Existing Revised <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />Total Site <br />Zone in Zone Hardcover Hardcover <br />Hardcover <br />0-75 7,575 s.f.Os.f <br />(0%) <br />2,317 s.f.* <br />(31%) <br />2,068 s.f. <br />(27.3%) <br />Existing <br />5.H9s.f.(87%of75 ‘- <br />250 ’zone) <br />75 - 250 6,425 s.f.1,606 s.f. <br />(25%) <br />3,302 s.f.* <br />(51%) <br />3,586 s.f. <br />(56%) <br />PnMioBcd <br />5.742 s./. (89%of 75 ’- <br />250 ’zone) <br />* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds