Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, Jnly 11,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(005-3097 Hashem Abnkliadra, Continued) <br />tonight ’s meeting. Gundlach stated the changes relate to Item No. 12, which requires that the subdivider <br />shall be responsible for the proposed improvements to Fox Street. <br />Gundlach pointed out this application would appear before the City Council one more time in order to act <br />on the final plat resolution. <br />Gundlach stated it is her understanding the applicant would like to discuss the septic sites for lot six. <br />Gundlach noted both of those sites are currently noncompliant but that as part of the subdivision, the <br />City’s septic code requires the septic sites to be made compliant. Gundlach stated the Council at the last <br />meeting gave the applicant one year to bring the septic sites into compliance and the applicant is now <br />requesting that he allowed two years. <br />Murphy inquired whether the septic site is currently nonconforming or noncompliant. <br />Gundlach stated the septic site for the main house is noncompliant and does not meet the two-foot <br />separation requirement and the guesthouse septic site is noncompliant. <br />Abukhadra stated to his knowledge he has until the year 2010 to make his septic site compliant, and noted <br />that he is requesting only two years to make the septic site compliant. <br />Murphy inquired whether there would be any risk of the ilituie septic sites being contaminated by the <br />construction project. <br />Gaffron indicated as long as the applicant complies with the City’s regulations concerning septic sites <br />during the construction phrase, it should not be a problem. <br />Sansevere inquired why the applicant would like two years to make the septic sites compliant. <br />Abukhadra indicated he does not want to have too many projects being undertaken at the same tiine. <br />Muiphy inquired whether the applicant will be the only person residing on the property during the <br />construction of the new residence. <br />Abukhadra indicated he would be the only person residing on the property. <br />Gaffron stated he does not see any major issues with allowing an extra year on the septic. <br />Gundlach stated Item No. 10 of the resolution would need to be amended to two years. <br />SanscvM’c aoved. White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5346, a ResoIntioB Grantiag <br />Prcihninary Approval of a Class ID Sabdlvidon for Froperty Located at 1745 and 1755 Fox Street, <br />with Item No. 10 being ananded to require installatioB of a conforming seven-bedroom septic <br />PAGE 4