Laserfiche WebLink
j' <br />t <br />k <br />FILE #05-3133 <br />30Jun*2005 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />MpirU mti iHteHt of the Orono Itmiot Code. <br />With respect to the hardcover variance staff finds that the increase in the depth of the <br />driveway is necessary to accommodate vehicle parking entirely within the applicants’ <br />property, and to avoid a vehicle hanging off the driveway into the street. Should the <br />applicants be required to meet a 10’ side yard setback for the detached garage? <br />Requiring the side setbacks to be met would place the garage entirely in front of the <br />home’s entrance to Birch Lane. There is no excess hardcover that can be removed. <br />Issues for ConsMeratioii <br />Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff RccouMMOdation <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the hardcover variance for 30.8% hardcover <br />where 30.2% was previously approved, approval of the rear yard and side yard setback <br />variances as proposed and should the Planning Commission find that a hardship exists <br />with respect to the size of garage allowed a structural coverage variance to allow 18.2% <br />where 18% was previously approved should be considered. <br />.—■—