My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-25-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
07-25-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 11:33:06 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 10:59:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
417
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Amm <br />4. <br />L'/a f ■ <br />a. The lot is a legal lot of record created prior to adoption of the current <br />Zoning Ordinance minimum area and width lot requirements. <br />b. The former residence existed on the substandard area lot since prior to <br />1960. <br />c. The proposed residence meets all other Zoning Ordinance <br />requirements with respect to setbacks, lot coverage by structures, <br />ha^cover, and building height. <br />d. The lot is provided with City sewer. <br />e. The applicants are not able to acquire additional dry upland acreage to <br />meet minimum lot area requirements without making an adjacent <br />property more substandard than currently exists. <br />f T1.C request for fill in excess of 500 cubic yards will not impact the <br />Property as viewed from the lake. <br />g. The elevation v^ch the fill is ultimately achieving already exists at <br />the southeastern comer of the Property. <br />h. Without incorporation of fill on the street side of the Property, any <br />attached garage would be set at a lower elevation than the main level <br />of a home, requiring steps to the main level of the home; due to the <br />reverse walk-out topographic configuration of the Property, as it exists <br />today. <br />i. Neither the wetland body nor its required 26 ’ setback will be impacted <br />by the proposed fill. <br />j. Neither the shared driveway nor the adjacent prop^;riies will be <br />negatively impacted by the proposed fill. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br />comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.