08-22-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i.. ms-3144 Aagttit 15,2005 Pagt I of2 Date Appliailloa R«ccivcd: 7-20-05 Date Applicalion CoasMercd as Coaiptetc: 7-20-05 <0-Day Review Period Eipires: 9-17-05 To: Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, Cit>' Administrator From: Janice Gundlach, City Planner^ Date: August 11,2005 Subject: #05-3144, Berkshire Properties on behalf of Professional Properties of Orono, LLP, 2745 Kelley Parkway, Commercial Site Plan Review Extension, Public Hearing Zoning District: Lot Area: Lot Width: B-6, PUD Planned Unit Development C acre minimum) 2.56 acres (111,308 s.f.) 376 feet Ap^kaHon Summary: Applicant requests an extension of a commercial site plan approval of June 14,2004 which permits construction of a 2>story office building totaling 36,000 square feet. Siqff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of a one year extension in accordance with the previously adopted Resolution #5191 and Developer’s Agreement, attached to this memo as Exhibits B and C. List of Exhibits Exhibit A- Application Exhibit B - Resolution #5191 Exhibit C - Developer’s Agreement Exhibit D - PC Memo & Exhibits of 2-13-04 Background The ai^licant received conunercial site plan approval in June of 2004 which permitted construction of a 2-stoiy office building directly east of the existing dental building at the Northeast comer of Old Crystal Bay Road and Highway 12 (2764 Kelley Parkway). The property was zoned and guided appropriately at the time 2765 Kelley Parkway to the direct west was developed. The site plan approved for this property fully complied with all B - 6 standards and included no variances from the code. The applicant approached staff at approximately the one year mark inquiring of whether an official extension would be required, as construction of the building was not in the immediate future. After review of the documents it became clear that a formal extension would benefit both parties as the expiration language in the approval Resolution stated ”if substantial development has not occurred witliin one year after approval of PUD No. 3A as set forth in the Platmed Unit Development No. 3A Agreement, the City Council may