Laserfiche WebLink
•TTr^ W-r - <br />MS4140 <br />Knut IS. 200S <br />PageSofS <br />5. Are there ray other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff ReconmendatioB <br />Staff recommends apinoval of the variances to allow the increased pitched roof as no <br />additional encroachment to the required rear yard is proposed and the additional height <br />will not impact adjacent pn^ierties views to the lake due to the curvature of the shoreline <br />in the cove. <br />Staff recommends that the Planning Commission discuss whether variances should be <br />granted to permit covered entries, v«dien the hardship almost always is the location of the <br />exiiting home on the lot If so, the Planning Commission may want to determine under <br />v^iat set of standards covered entries, requiring variances, should meet (for example, <br />ftilly enclosed, unenclosed, size maximums, etc.). <br />. ... JiA—-.,■,1..