Laserfiche WebLink
J-?I <br /><■ <br />rIf <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Moaday, A«gn>( ^ 2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(Home OceapatloB Lkcasc Review, Coatkiaed) <br />Oaffron indicated the code does not address that specifically and that it would be up to the discretion of <br />the Council. <br />Barrett pointed out Staff has concluded that no license can be issued because of the nature of the business <br />and that this hearing could be considered a review of that decision. Barrett stated the question becomes <br />whether it is still a home occupation if no business is being conducted outside of the storage of <br />equipment <br />Gaffron stated in his opiition the storage of commercial equipment during the winter would be considered <br />a business. <br />Marphy amved that the Coaacll finds that this Is a home occupatloa that li prohibited under City <br />Code aad Rut the property owners have 90 days from today’s date to rcoMve the equipment off <br />site. <br />Mrs. Cordes inquired whether the mower could be kept on site as well as the wood chipper for their <br />persoiul landac^ing. <br />Peterson stated they could be stored on site as long as it is used for personal reasons. Peterson stated the <br />bobcat and trailer would probably need to be stored off site. <br />Sorenson stated he would like to see the regulations upheld and that he would like to see the equipment <br />utilized in tfie business removed. <br />Bret Riemenschneider, 835 Forest Arms Landing, stated in his opinion mowers on trailers leaving once a <br />day is not a nuisance. Riemenschneider indicated the Cordes property is clean and well maintained and <br />that dw equipment is being parked indoors. <br />White stated the ordinance specifically prohibits this type of business in a residential neighborhood. <br />Peterson suggested the applicant work with Staff to determine which pieces of equipment could remain <br />on the property. <br />McMillan suggested Staff determine which pieces of equipment should be allowed to stay. <br />Curtis read the section relating to special mobile equipment and noted that special mobile equipment is <br />not allowed to be stored outdoors. <br />White concurred that Staff could determine which pieces of equipment can remam on the (voperty. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays LFetenoa Opposed. <br />b. .. <br />PAGE 13 <br />_AM1 . . <br />n <br />! <br />H <br />f <br />ii <br />! * <br />t