My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-22-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 11:25:44 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 10:57:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MmUTESOFTHE <br />ORONO aTY COimCIL MEETING <br />Moaday, Aagatt 8,2005 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.ai. <br />(Hobw Occapatloa Lkcaic Review, Coattaaed) <br />White stated the City has received letters from more people who support this business than those who are <br />opposed to it but that in his view the people who live closest to the business have the most say. White <br />stated the city ordinance is very clear and does not allow this type of business. <br />Sansevere inquired whether the property owner could store the equipment on his property if he has an <br />office separate from dte residence. <br />Gaffron stated it would probably be considered commercial storage. Gaffron stated it falls under the <br />home occiq»ation ordinance because it is being run primarily from the home. <br />Barrett stated it appears that a level one home occupation license could probably be granted to allow just <br />an office at this location but that the storage of the business equipment is the deciding factor. <br />Peterson inquired whether the applicant does any snow plowing in the winter. <br />Mr. Cordes stated he does not do snow plowing. <br />Peterson stated she has a concern since the garage was constructed primarily for the business. <br />Mr. Cordes stated he would have constructed the garage even if he did not own the business. <br />Sansevere commented the Council's hands would be tied even if the neigh'oors were not opposed to this <br />business. <br />Mrs. Cordes inquired which equipii^ent is objectionable, noting that the majority of the equipment was <br />owned prior to starting the business. <br />Curtis stated if the equipment is for personal use, the item that is considered special mobile equipment <br />would be the bobcat and would be required to be stored in a garage. Curtis stated Items S utd 9 are <br />triggered when the equipment is used for business reasons. <br />Murphy inquired whether the applicant makes money with the equipment. <br />Mr. Cordes stated he does. <br />Murphy inquired whether Mr. Cordes makes money from other endeavors outside of this business. <br />Mr. Cordes indicated he does not. <br />Murphy reiterated this business unfortunately does not fit the neighborhood. <br />Mrs. Cordes pointed out there are very few properties in their neighborhood and that one home or another <br />has been undn construction since they moved there. <br />PAGE 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.