Laserfiche WebLink
Date AppIkalioN Received: S-26-05 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 7-l2*0S <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 9-10-05 <br />COi »«f-rxinjQ <br />AUG 8 2005 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cl Mf* Ul- UHONO <br />Date: August 3,2005 <br />Item No.: <br />Department Approval:Adminbtrator Approval: <br />Name: Janice Gundlach^ <br />Title: City Planner <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #05-3126, Todd & Mysti Coumeya, 4620 Tonkaview Lane <br />Variance - Resolution <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />LR - 1 B, One Family Lakeshore Residential District ( 1 acre min.) <br />0.48 acres (20,900 s.f.) <br />215 feet (140 ’ required) <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendation <br />B - PC Action Notice dated 7-19-05 <br />C - Draft PC Minutes of 7-18-05 <br />D - PC Memo and Exhibits of 7-13-05 <br />AppUcathn Summary: Applicant requests the following variance in order to construct garage <br />additions with living space above to the existing two-stall attached garage: <br />1. Front yard setback variance to permit a front y ‘tback of 20’ when 35’ is normally <br />requir^ 25’ currently exists, and 25’ was appro • variance in 1995. <br />(The applicant has agreed to meet the Planning Commissto.. recommendation, which reduces the <br />fix>rtt yard setback variance request to a 25’ setback where 35’ is normally required and 25’ <br />currently exists and was approved by variance in 1995). <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to deny the requested front yard setback variance of 20’ when <br />35’ is normally required based on the findings and reconunendations of the 1995 variance approval <br />permitting a setback of 25’. The Planning Commission stated they would be in favor of supporting a <br />ftont yard setback variance request at the current 25’ setback for living space above the existing <br />garage and also to construct an attached garage addition, with living space above, meeting a 25’ <br />setback to the front lot line and a 10’ side yard setback. <br />The applicant has indicated he will revise his proposed plans to conform to the Planning <br />Commission’s recommendation. Revised plans have not been submitted; however staff is