Laserfiche WebLink
Rider B ennett , LLP <br />City of Orono <br />July 13.2005 <br />Page 2 <br />I attach a copy of the Novonber 24, 2004 Survey we obtained showing Ms. Benson has <br />installed "hardcover" or boulders and other landscaping within Mr. Puzak's access easement area. <br />We believe Ms. Benson did this in violation of the 2003 Resolution. I attach photographs taken <br />by our surveyor in late 2004 (when he performed the November 24,2004 survey) - the 1998 date <br />shown on thon is incorrect. I witnessed the surveyor taking these photographs. The siuveyor <br />marked the boundary of Mr. Puzak's easement with orange cones, and as you can see, Ms. <br />Benson has installed a stone roosto ’, various landscqring and boulders, a mailbox, and a metal <br />lattice U-shaped structure in the area of the easement adversely affecting Mr. Puzak's use for <br />access. <br />We hereby notify you that we believe Ms. Bmson is currently in violation of the zoning <br />code. We object to the variance curroitly being ^lied for by Ms. Benson and request a copy of <br />the Survey dhe supplied to you showing property boundary lines and the access easement's <br />location. We request that the City look at the Survey Ms. Benson provided you and determine <br />whether she has dqiicted the easement area at all on that survey, or if she did disclose the <br />easement, determine whether the easement area dqiicted differs ^m our November 24, 2004 <br />Survey. I wonder if Ms. Benson even disclosed the existence of Mr. Puzak's easement to the <br />City. <br />Ms. Benson may have depicted the area of the driveway currently "in use" on her survey, <br />but that does not show the ACTUAL boundaries of the access easonent. Obviously, since Ms. <br />Benson has applied for a variance to enlarge the size of her garage and her home, the location of <br />the easement is of utmost importance and should be carefully considered by the City before a <br />variance can be granted. We req)ectfully request that any variance considoation be postponed <br />by the City until the easement dilute can be resolved by a court of law. as the location of the <br />easement is in dispute. <br />Please call me if you have any questions or require any additional information. <br />Very truly yours. <br />RIDER BENNETT, LLP <br />^ Jfldii&r W. Denys ^ <br />JWD <br />Enclosum <br />oc; Fired Puzak (via mail w/ copies of |4os) <br />■*V • <br />• .»ftlOlRUlMNBTT'