Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />FILE #05-3130 <br />12 July 2005 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />structural Coverage; <br />Total Lot Area Total Stroctural Coverage <br />12,726 s.f (0.29 acre)Allowed: 1,908.9 s.f (15%) <br />Existing: 2,741 s.f (21.5%) <br />Proposed: 2,685 s.f (21%) <br />Allowed Per 2003 Variance: 2,741 s.f (21.5%) <br />Hardcover Calculations; <br />Hardcover <br />Zoae <br />0-75 <br />75 - 250 <br />Total Area ia <br />ZOBC <br />10.614 s.f. <br />2,112s.f. <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Os.f <br />(0%) <br />528 s.f. <br />(25%) <br />Existiog <br />Hardcover <br />3,463 s.f.* <br />(32.6%) <br />664 s.f ♦ <br />(31.4%) <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />3,492 s.f <br />(32.9%) <br />Total <br />Hardcover** <br />624 s.f <br />(29.5%) <br />Fxisting <br />,127 s.f <br />(195%) <br />Proposed <br />4.116 s.f <br />(194.8%) <br />* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />** After addition of non-conforming 0-75’ zone hardcover to the 75 ’-250’ zone. <br />Hardcover & Structural Coverage Variance <br />Tne applicant ’s lot is located near the north end of Baldur Park peninsula. Because of this, 83% <br />of the lot area is within 75 ’ of the OHWL. The applicant ’s home is located entirely within the <br />75 ’ setback causing the property to be extremely nonconforming with respect to hardcover. <br />Additionally, the structural coverage on the lot exceeds the 15% limit. Currently there is 21.5% <br />structural coverage and tlie applicant is proposing a slight reduction with the reduced size <br />proposal for a structural coverage level of 21%. The current structural cover level is a result of <br />past variance approvals. The survey of the easement area submitted by the neighbor shows some <br />boulder landscape borders which may slightly increase the westerly 0-75’ hardcover calculations, <br />at this time staff does not have an accurate calculation. <br />Lake Setback Variance <br />The buildable area outside the 75 ’ setback is 2,112 s.f. in a triangular shape, and the entire hom ■ <br />is located within the required 75 ’ iake setback zone. Any improvement to this home requires a <br />variance. Although the applicant is proposing the move more structure into the lake scioack <br />area, it does provide the applicant with the ability to park vehicles on the driveway )n the <br />property rather than on the neighboring property. <br />Average Lakesbore Setback Variance <br />The property is located on a peninsula. The average lakeshore setback is defined by the existing <br />setback of the house to the immediate east of the property. The existing house and deck <br />encroach approximately 49’ past the defined easterly average setback line. However, the new <br />garage will not encroach further into that neighbor’s easterly lake views, but may encroach or <br />reduce their westerly views due to its added height. <br />m <br />u u ana f