Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />Lot Line Rc-Aming«iiiciit <br />Lot Existing <br />Area <br />Existing <br />Width <br />Proposed <br />Area <br />Proposed <br />Width <br />4480 Forest Lake Landing 14,489 s.f 58 ’-shoreline <br />45.5’-75 ’ SB 14,882 s.f 56 ’-shoreline <br />45’-75 ’ SB <br />1090 Wildhurst Trail 20,505 s.f 57 ’-shoreline <br />63 ’-75 ’ SB 20,116 s.f 60 ’-shoreline <br />65 ’-75 ’ SB <br />4480 Fomt Lake Landing - Hardcover Calculations (existing percentages will be based on the <br />zone square footages pre-lot line re-arrangement; proposed percentages will be based on post-lot line <br />re-arrangement square footages. <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />0-75 <br />75 - 250 <br />250 - 500 <br />Total Area in Zone <br />(eilsling/proposed) <br />4,134/3,834 s.f. <br />7,758 / 7,974 s.f. <br />2,597/3,074 s.f <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Cs.f.) <br />0 <br />10%) <br />1,940/1,994 <br />(25%) <br />779 / 922 <br />(30%) <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />0 s.f* <br />(0%) <br />3,165 s.f* <br />(40.8%) <br />1,425 s.f* <br />(54.9%) <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />Os.f <br />(0%) <br />1,832 s.f <br />(22.97%) <br />1,845 s.f <br />(60%) <br />1090 Wildhurst Trail - Hardcover Calculations (existing and proposed percentages based on pre <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />Total Area In Zone <br />(cxisting/proposed) <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />(a.f.) <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />0-75 4,491 / 4,661 s.f 0 <br />(0%) <br />0 s.f* <br />(0%) <br />0 s.f <br />(0%) <br />75 - 250 12,210/12,159 s.f 3,053 / 3,040 <br />(25%) <br />5,591 s.f* <br />(45.79%) <br />5,591 s.f <br />(45.98%) <br />250 - 500 3,804 / 3,296 s.f 1,141 /989 <br />(30%) <br />825 s.f * <br />(21.69%) <br />825 s.f <br />(25.03%) <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their May and June PC meetings. The <br />Planning Commission ultimately voted 6-0 to approve the most recent revision, which is noted <br />above in the application summary. The Planning Commission stipulated this approval on submittal <br />of a fevorable engineering report indicating the existing foundation could support the proposed <br />improvements. <br />A preliminary report from the applicant ’s engineer is favorable, however the applicant has requested <br />further guidance with regard to a rebuild vs. a renovation/addition as the cost to conduct the latter is <br />probably mote costly than a total rebuild. The applicant requested that the Planning Commission <br />provide an altenutte recommendation should a rebuild be necessary. The Planning Commission <br />chose only to vote on the renovation/addition proposal submitted, suggesting tliey would want to see <br />this application again if it becomes a rebuild.