My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 10:24:49 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:37:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 27,2005 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />5. H9S’i997 Haskem AbuUuuIrm, i745 Fax Street - SmbtUvisiati, CoatUmed <br />Sansevere stated that he was unable to see how a hardship created by the applicant could be considered a hardship. <br />Gronberg stated that in order to eliminate the second access from Fox Street, the applicant was forced to create the <br />back-lot scenario. <br />Attorney Barrett explained that a hardship must be derived from the land, though he could see where moving the <br />road due to problems with the land and the need to delineate septic sites could be articulated into a hardship. <br />Gronberg concurred, adding that avoiding the second access off Fox Street created an additional hardship. <br />Mayor Peterson asked whether Council members were comfortable with the hardship as articulated by Attorney <br />Barren, that the guest house be allowed to remain acknowledging the removal of the main house is not imminent. <br />Gaffron questioned in 20 years when the time came to rebuild the guest house, whether this agreement, though put <br />in the chain of title, might be forgonen. He referred to staff s original recommendation that the guest house be <br />removed. <br />Murphy moved, White seconded, that the guest house be removed if lot 6 is to be considered a back-lot. <br />VOTE: Ayes 2, Nays 3, Sansevere, Mayor Peterson, and McMillan dissenting. <br />McMillan moved, Sansevere seconded, that the guest house be allowed to remain until such time that it is <br />redeveloped baaed on existlag hardships due to septic sHcs, back-lot scenario and the topography of the site. <br />VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 2, White and Murphy dimenting due to the lack of hardship. <br />McMillan moved. White seconded, that Lot d be considered a back-lot, with the eUmination of the Fox <br />Street accem for safety reasons. VOTE: Ayes S, Nays 0. <br />With regard to the septic sites, Gaffron pointed out that the first septic site must be built now to serve the main md <br />guest houses, before final plat approval. <br />Murphy UMved, White seconded, that the City Council accepts the premise that two 7-bedroom septic <br />mound systems arc sufficient with one to he built within one year, and a second site to be preserved for <br />future use. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />White moved, and then withdrew a motion to require the ^licant to complete a tree survey, as no policy is in <br />place to demand this of an applicant, thus unfair in this situation. <br />Abukhadra stated that his family wishes to preserve as many trees as possible, though removal of some trees is <br />neoessary. <br />McMillan questioned how the lakeshore or shoreland overlay might inqmct future accc» via docks etc. <br />Abukhadra stated diat there is one dock the peninsula of the property currently. <br />Fage6ofl2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.