My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 10:24:49 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:37:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br />i; ■ <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, April 18,2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(005*3097 Hashem Abakbadra, Continued) <br />Oaflron stated this issue was discussed with Gronberg. Gafiron stated the City did a wetland inventory in <br />1974, which did not include many wetlands that would now be included. The City has established a <br />moratorium on wetlands, which has been in effect for the past six months. Gaffron stated under the old <br />ordinance some « those wetland delineations would be allowed as dry buildable. Gaffron stated since <br />there is a moratorium in effect, this property would be subject to whatever the new regulations are and <br />that it is likely that area would not be considered diy buildable. <br />Rahn pointed out this is an environmentally delicate area and questioned whether some of the City’s other <br />codes relating to the environment would apply in this situation, which could impact the building pads. <br />Gaffron stated the design process that is being reviewed as part of the rural oasis moratorium consists of <br />looking at the visual impacts of development from across the lake and down the road. That study resulted <br />in conclusions that the City will require in the future that some buffering be done in these types of <br />developments to reduce the visual impact of new homes from lakes and/or wetland. <br />Gaffron stated that study was originally put in place for larger developments but that the Council may <br />find it beneficial to use the study on smaller developments as well to help preserve some of the rural <br />characteristics of the area. Gaf^n stated this property is net under a moratorium for development but <br />just a moratorium relating to wetlands. <br />Kempf commented in his opinion it would be beneflcial to have a study done on this property. <br />Abukhadra questioned how this property would visually affect other property owners. <br />Kempf stated if a two and a half story house is constructed on one of these lots, it would be visible for <br />miles. <br />Abukhadra stated the purpose of constructing a house on top of a hill is to get a view of the lake, but that <br />they are planning to leave the property pretty much as is and are not planning on constructing any houses <br />in next few years. <br />Gronberg stated there are three tax parcels at the present time and that they would like to do some <br />long-term planning and create one ^itional lot. <br />Rahn stated he still has an issue with the setbacks concerning the guesthouse. <br />Jurgens stated in his opinion the setbacks should be met since this would be considered new construction. <br />Gundlach stated a setback variance would be needed from Fox Street. <br />Rahn stated at the time the existing house is redeveloped would be the time to address any <br />nonconformities. <br />iAk <br />>i -PAGE 13 <br />n <br />JLmJLA
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.