My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 10:24:49 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:37:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
m <br />-.i-sSlij <br />4. <br />5. <br />a. The property has a total area of 0.71 acre and 132’ of lot width. <br />b. City Code 78-966 allows for the grading and tilling within 75’ of the <br />OHWL of Lake Minnetonka by conditional use permit. <br />c. The proposed subterranean walls have been reviewed by the City <br />Engineer and the Engineer had the following recommendation; <br />i. In order to reduce the potential for another wash out or other <br />damage during the initial (6-year) period, the surface of the <br />existing natural soil should be “roughed up’’ so that the <br />compacted clay fill can be integrated into it. <br />d. The proposed subterranean walls will have no negative visual impact <br />and will be re-vegetated for a natural looking slope. <br />e. The applicants have provided a restoration plan meeting the goals and <br />intent of the 2^ning Code and the Orono Community Management <br />Plan. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendation of tlw Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br />comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br />variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br />peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br />district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic <br />conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br />property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br />preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br />Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.