Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #05-3118 <br />13 June 2005 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Hardcov«r CalculaHong; <br />Hardcover <br />Zoae <br />0-75 <br />75-250 <br />Total Area <br />in Zone <br />8,750 s.f <br />I3,700s.f. <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />os.r <br />(0%) <br />3,425 s.f. <br />(25%) <br />Exiating <br />Hardcover <br />994 s.f.* <br />(II.4%) <br />3,374 s.f.* <br />(24.6%) <br />Proposed <br />Haidcovcr <br />501 s.f. <br />(5.7%) <br />4,036 s.f. <br />(29.5%) <br />Total <br />Hardcover <br />(laclyding <br />noiKoarormiag <br />0-75 ’ HQ <br />Existing <br />4,368 s.f. or <br />31% <br />Proposed <br />4,537 s.f. or <br />33% <br />After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />Rear Yard Setback Varlaacc <br />The applicants are proposing to construct an attached garage addition on to the existing <br />home with a story above. A large portion of the applicants ’ driveway and existing <br />detached garage exist within the platted cul-de-sac right-of-way. While the length of the <br />driveway from the paved street to the proposed addition is 64’ the distance from the rear <br />property line to the proposed addition is 28 ’. The existing home is 47’ from the rear <br />property line. <br />Hardcover Vaiiance <br />As the property currently has nonconforming hardcover within the 0-75’ and the 75 ’-250’ <br />zones, the applicants are proposing hardcover removals within both zones as part of their <br />application. They are proposing to remove an existing 426 s.f. lake side deck and a shed <br />which are located entirely within the 75 ’ setback. The shed and the deck constitute 473 <br />s.f. of structural hardcover removals and the applicants are proposing to add 998 s.f. of <br />garage addition to the home. <br />Average Lakesbore Setback Variance <br />The applicants ’ property and the neighboring properties are located on a peninsula; all of <br />the homes on the point are located ahead of the average lake setback. This is illustrated <br />in the aerial photo attached as Exhibit E. Half of the applicants ’ home is lakeward of the <br />average lakeshore setback; the proposed addition will also be approximately located <br />within the average lakeshore setback. <br />Hardship Statcmcnl <br />Applicants have completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />/ff eomHertHt for vortomce, the PlauMtHg ComnlMMtoH shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the heoUh, spfety and teelfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br />eondhhms, Hght and air, danger efflre, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property In <br />the surroundtng area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances <br />pom the Merol provMom of the Zoning Code In Imtonces where their strict enforcement would cause <br />undue hardship because of clrcumslonees unique to the Individual property under conslderalton, and <br />-------