My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
07-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 10:24:49 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:37:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
k <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 15,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(#04-3067 LECY CONSTRUCTION, CONTINUED) <br />Fritzler stated in his opinion the Public Works Department should deal with the snow in another way, but <br />that as long as the applicant is going to utilize that area for parking, it should be counted as hardcover. <br />Bremer stated she does not want to have a situation where the City is taking advantage of people because <br />they are living it< a particular location or where the Planning Commission is committing the City to doing <br />something other than what has been done for years and years. Bremer indicated she does not feel <br />comfortable requiring the Public Works Department to do something different in this area and that she <br />would prefer to keep the situation status quo and perhaps revisit the issue in the future. <br />Bremer stated she would be interested to hear any recommendations Staff might have for hardcover <br />removals. Bremer stated in her view it does not make sense to replace the rock if it is going to be <br />compacted again in a year or two. <br />Jurgens inquired how that area would become compacted if only snow is put in that area. <br />Bremer stated if rock is put down in that area, people would more than likely park there. <br />Jurgens stated he does have an issue with putting something in that area that could potentially be <br />destroyed and that perhaps it is necessaty to have Public Works at the meeting to answer question:,. <br />Jurgens stated he feels very strongly that this hardcover needs to be removed, noting it was approved at <br />29.9 percent. Jurgens pointed out the area near the bluff was not included in the calculations. <br />Gundlach indicated the survey that was approved for the building permit in 1989 required the rock <br />southerly of the 2S0’ lake setback be removed and the rock northerly of the 2S0’ lake setback could <br />remain as the lot folly conformed with ail hardcover standards. The variance in 1999 allowed access <br />hardcover. <br />Rahn noted there could perhaps be a removal of hardcover between the edge of that area towards the <br />home. Rahn stated the applicant needs a method of swaling water around the lower doors and that the <br />timbers constitute less hardcover than boulders and are also less intrusive. <br />Jurgens noted there is a hump farther down that holds the water back and that it might be a grading issue. <br />Rahn inquired whether the wing wall would be eddressed at another time. <br />Gaffron stated the addition is going on the west side of the house so that area of the lawn may not be <br />addressed as a part of this project unless required by the City. <br />Rahn stated he is willing to leave the little win^ wall for deflection of water given the small amount of <br />hardcover that it constitutes and also because tl e applicant has indicated he is willing to do other <br />hardcover reductions. <br />PAGE 31
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.