Laserfiche WebLink
«^0S-3il2 <br />Muy 16,2005 <br />Page S of 8 <br />variance to permit a 10* setback when 30’ is normally required. A 30’ setback for an <br />attached garage to the existing home would not be attainable. <br />Hardcover V ariance <br />The applicant is proposing hardcover variances for the 7S’-2S0 ’ zone and the 250 ’-500 ’ <br />zones to permit 26.7% and 60% when 2S% and 30% are permitted and 40.8% and 54.9% <br />exists respectively. These percentages are based on the property areas should a lot line <br />re-arrangement be permitted. The applicant proposes to remove the existing detached <br />garage and the bituminous drive that currently serves it, and to add an attached garage <br />and living additions to the existing footprint. The applicant proposes to construct an <br />additional story and a half to the existing single story and also to add a lake side deck and <br />use the existing detached garage slab as a patio. This results in a net hardcover reduction <br />of 647 s.f. on the entire property, consisting of removal of 1,067 s.f. of hardcover within <br />the 75’-250* zone and the addition of420 s.f. of hardcover in the 250 ’-500 ’ zone. <br />It is also pertinent to show how the hardcover percentages for the lot at 1190 Wildhurst <br />Trail are affected, as this is the lot included in the lot line re-arrangement. Hardcover <br />within the 0-75’ zone will remain conforming at 0% where the hardcover percentage for <br />the 75’-250 ’ zone is going from 45.79% to 45.98% and in the 250 ’-500 ’ zone from <br />21.69% to 25.03%. While the 0-75’ zone and 250 ’-500 ’ zones will remain conforming, <br />the 75’-250 ’ zone would rise O.Wo or approximately 6 square feet using the post lot-line <br />re-arrangement areas. <br />Structural Coverage V ariance <br />The applicant is also requesting a structural coverage variance to permit 16.5% structural <br />coverage when 15% is normally allowed. The 16.5% is based on the lot area if the lot <br />line re-arrangement is accepted. If a lot line re-arrangement were not accepted, the <br />proposed structural coverage would be 17% with the current plan. The proposal includes <br />2,233 s.f of house footprint and a 230 s.f. lake side deck. Currently, the lot is <br />conforming at 2,003 s.f of structure or 13.8%. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br />additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship A nalysis <br />/« comlderlHg appikalloiafor variance, ike Hanning Conunbshn shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the conununlty, existing and anticipated <br />traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safely, and the effect on values of <br />property In the surrounding area. The Hanning Commission shall consider recommending approval <br />for variances from literal provisions of the Zoning Code in Instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual <br />property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when It Is demonurated that such <br />actions will be In keeping with the spirit and Intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Municipal Sewer Location A Lot Width Impacts <br />Stair finds that a hardship is inherent to the land based on the location of the existing