Laserfiche WebLink
<ras-.^ii2 <br />May 16,2005 <br />Page I ofS <br />Dale Applicatioa Received: 4-20-05 <br />Date Applicatioa Comidcred as Complete: S-4-05 <br />60-Day Review Period Espires: 7-3-05 <br />To; <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Janice Gundlach, City Planner^ <br />May 5,2005 <br />05-3112, Loren & Stacey Schoenzeit, 4480 Forest Lake Landing, <br />Lot Line Re-Arrangement, Front Yard Setback Variance, Hardcover <br />Variance, Structural Coverage Variance, Public Hearing <br />Zoning Obtrict: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />LR - IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre min.) <br />0.33 acre (14,489 s.f.) <br />58* @ shoreline; 45.5’ @ 75 ’ setback <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests the following in order to construct additions <br />onto the existing footprint and to remodel the existing residence: <br />1. Lot line re-arrangement with 1090 Wildhurst Trail whereby a land exchange <br />would result in two non-conforming area and width lots to remain non ­ <br />conforming in area and width. <br />2. Rear/Street yard setback variance to permit a setback o** approximately 10’ when <br />30’ is normally required and 8’ currently exists. <br />3. Hardcover variance to permit 26.7% hardcover withii. 75 ’-250’ zone where <br />25% is normally allowed and 40.8% currently exists (percentages based on post ­ <br />lot line re-arrangement zone areas). <br />4. Hardcover variance to permit 60% hardcover within the 250’-500 ’ zone where <br />30% is normally allow^ and 54.9% currently exists (percentages based on post ­ <br />lot line re-arrangement zone areas). <br />5. Structural coverage variance to permit 16.5% structural coverage where 15% is <br />normally allowed and 15% currently exists (proposed percentage based on post ­ <br />lot line re-arrangement lot area). <br />SUiff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the application as submitted. Staff <br />would recommend that the applicant revise the plan to at a minimum meet the following: <br />1. Eliminate the need for a structural coverage variance, <br />2. Eliminate existing and proposed retaining walls/curbs within the right-of-way, <br />3. Reduction of the proposed lake yard patio extending beyond the deck in an effort <br />to reduce hardcover hirther within the 75 ’-250’ zone, preferably to 25%, <br />4. Eliminate the portions of proposed new structure (SE comer of house) coming <br />within 10’ of an existing sewer line, <br />5. Revise lot line rearrangement request whereby lot areas and widths for both lots <br />remain unchanged. <br />Staff also would recommend that the City Engineer review the proposed grading plan <br />prior to Planning Commission approval.___________________________ <br />I