06-27-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MM-2969 June 20,2005 Pigc2or3 Exhibit C - Review Period Extension Letter Exhibit D - Proposed 0-75’ Site Plan Exhibit E - Proposed Cross Section Exhibit F - City Engineer Letter dated May 25,2005 Exhibit 0 - Property Owners List Exhibit H - Plat Map BackgroiiBd The applicant appeared before the Planning Commission several times in early 2004 seeking a hardcover variance for the 75’-250* zone. The initial application made included a conditional use permit for land alterations with the 0-75’ zone. Throughout the review the applicant was unable to obtain a landscaper and/or engineer who could draft the necessary plans for review by the City Engineer. Rather than hold up the hardcover variance approval, and ultimately a full remodel of the applicant’s home, the applicant chose to extend the 60-day review period indefinitely for the CUP portion of the q)plication. The applicant has received a temporary Certificate of Occupancy and a final is expected once final grading has occurred, following approval and implementation of the proposed plans for the CUP. CoaditioBal Use Permit ABalysis The City Engineer has reviewed and approved the proposed plans. Zoning Ordinance Section 78-1250 (1) establishes the following evaluation criteria for conditional uses within the Shoreland Overlay District; Evaluation criteria. A thorough evaluation of the water body and the topographic, vegetation and soils conditions on the site must be made to ensure: The prevention of soil erosion or the possible pollution of public waters, both during and after construction; The plans submitted indicate the erosion control methods proposed The City Engineer has required that prior to any site work the erosion control measures should be installed and inspected. b.The visibility of structures and other facilities as viewed from public waters is limited; Currently, a single railroad tie retaining wall exists which runs perpendicular to the shoreline. This wall will be replaced with two four foot boulder wall, also running perpendicular to the shoreline. These walls are necessary due to the drastic changes in grade from the high side of the wall to the low .side. The negative visual impacts as viewed from the water are minimized as the walls will run perpendicular to the shoreline and a planting plan is proposed which will screen the walls. c. The site is adequate for water supply and on-site sewage treatment; li