Laserfiche WebLink
MlNtTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Moaday, Jaac 13* 2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.ai. <br />(Jack aad Karl Olaoo, Coatlaocd) <br />Peterson noted the applicant would need to submit a new application if he wishes to proceed forward with <br />an attached garage. <br />McMillan pointed out the applicant would probably need to comply with the IS percent structural <br />coverage limit if a new application is submitted. <br />Gaffron noted a portion of the living space on the lower level would need to be converted into garage <br />space. <br />Olson stated tfutt portion includes a kitchen and a bathroom and they are not in a financial position to <br />remodel that at this time. <br />Murphy stated it was his understanding they had proposed a detached garage because of the costs <br />associtfed with attaching the garage. <br />Olson stated they are simply moving the garage over. <br />Curtis stated the Council had previously approved the structural coverage at 1711 square feet, with the <br />structural coverage on this lot currently being approximately 1200 square feet Curtis stated the detached <br />garage consists of 441 square feet. <br />McMillan pointed out there is more massing on the lot with the attached garage. McMillan noted there <br />was no restriction put on the approval for adding a second story to the detached garage. <br />Gaffron stated in his opinion a second story would need to be reviewed since it would be located within <br />7S feet of die lake. Gaffron displayed the design that was previously approved. Gaffron stated a new <br />application would need to be submitted if a second story is added to the detached garage. <br />Curtis noted the approval did not include the dormers that are depicted on the drawing. <br />Olson indicated his surveyor included the dormers on the garage for aesthetic reasons. <br />Peterson stated total hardcover on the lot after construction of the garage and some blacktop removals <br />would be at 43 percent <br />Curtis stated the applicant would be constructing the garage over existing hardcover. Curtis inquired how <br />the hardcover was reduced from 48 to 43 percent as shown on the updated survey. <br />Olson stated he instructed the surveyor to relocate the detached garage next to the house and that he is <br />unsure why the hardcover number changed. <br />Curtis inquired whether the applicant is proposing any further hardcover removals. <br />Olson stated he is not. <br />PAGE 12 <br />J\