My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:48:03 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:14:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Mondayt May 16« 2005 <br />0:00 o*dock p.m. <br />Rasmussen noted there are some trees that would be lost as a result of the construction and that they are <br />requesting that those trees be replaced on a three to one or four to one basts. Rasmussen stated they also <br />would like the applicant to bear the cost of removing those trees. <br />Rasmussen stated the natural grading of the property shifts direction from the north to the south towards <br />their property. Rasmussen stated their property is located two to three feet lower than the subject property <br />and that they would like some assurance that the runoff is addressed in that area. Rasmussen indicated <br />they would not be opposed to a berm in that area. <br />Rasmussen stated they do not have any issues with the layout and footprint of the house, but indicated <br />they would like to see the buffer replaced on their side of the swale. <br />There were no further public comments. <br />Kellogg indicated he has not had a chance to review the latest drainage plan until tonight. Kellogg stated <br />the previous concerns dealt with the drainage and how it should be handled. Kellogg stated some issues <br />for discussion are whether the size of the house is appropriate for the lot and is the footprint situated in the <br />right position. Kellogg stated the perception from the lake should be taken into account when considering <br />the two-tiered wall. <br />Kellogg stated the grades of the swale are also a concern, noting that a five percent swale is typically the <br />maximum on a slope without some further engineering. <br />Rahn inquired whether the height of the wall would be reduced as it goes further north up into tlie <br />property line. <br />Buchanich stated the height of the wall would decrease as it goes near the property line. <br />Kellogg stated in his opinion aliowing the wall to encroach within five feet of the property line is a better <br />solution. <br />Buchanich stated they would like to direct the drainage into the center of the lot. <br />Rahn stated he would like to see a gradual swale. Rahn inquired what type of screening is being proposed <br />and what type of materiab would be used to construct the wall. <br />PAGE IS
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.