My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
06-27-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:48:03 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:14:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M5-3I00 <br />J um20,2005 <br />PagtSofS <br />was denied at 4753 North Shore Drive - Minnetonka Custom Homes). Staff feels <br />a formal easement allowing the wall over the lot line would most cleanly address <br />the ownership and maintenance issue, should that part of the wall fail in the future <br />and new owners no longer understand the original agreement or intent of the wall <br />design. No formal easement has been proposed by the applicant, but rather an <br />agreement, which is attached as Exhibit E. <br />A specific screening plan hasn ’t been requested or submitted. Does the Planning <br />Commission want to see a screening plan? <br />Issues for ConsMcratlon <br />1. Should the grading plan include the requirement of a rain garden, or similar <br />physically graded landscape feature, which would prevent erosion of the lakeshore <br />ya^ and subsequently negative impacts to the lake? <br />2. Is the Planning Commission comfortable with the agreement submitted regarding the <br />encroaching retaining wall? <br />3. Should a wall screening plan be submitted as part of the conditional use permit? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />1. Approval of the requested lot area and lot width variances. <br />2. Approval of die conditional use permit to allow retaining walls and grading within <br />S’ of the lot line, however the plan submitted and attached to this report as Exhibit <br />A must be revised prior to Council review pending conclusions by the <br />Commission regarding the following: <br />Requirement of a rain garden or an alternate graded landscape feature that <br />will sfKcad water out over a wider area i^ere the swales converge on the <br />lake side of the walls, rather than concentrating the water at the end of the <br />swales to a single point. <br />• The wall design should be revised on the grading plan whereby the tail <br />end of the wall extends over the lot line. The length of this wall ^uld be <br />minimized. <br />Agreement with adjacent property owner on the ownership and <br />maintenance of the wall constructed over the lot line, <br />Screening of the walls from the lake. <br />rt ■
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.