My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
06-13-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:49:00 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 9:13:07 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Browne noted in 1993 the amount orbuildable land on his lot was determined to be .95 acres and today it <br />is being determined at .90. <br />Bremer indicated she would be in favor of the dormer and that the issue appears to be the garage. <br />Rahn indicated he also would be in favor of the dormer and inquired whether the garage would be <br />extending further into the setback. <br />i!-V <br />Jurgens stated he also is not opposed to the dormer but would like clarification on the hardcover. <br />Bremer noted structural coverage would not be increasing. <br />f <br />Browne stated the garage would be constructed over existing hardcover and that they would like to have <br />more storage. Browne noted the basement is not a full basement. <br />Curtis stated the Planning Report from 1993 states that the existing hardcover in the 0-7Sā zone was 17.S <br />percent or 4540 square feet and within the 75*-250ā existing was 1216 square feet or 7.8 percent. <br />Jurgens stated it appears that the hardcover has ^own fh>m the time of the original approvals. Jurgens <br />indicated he would like to see some reductions in the hardcover, noting that the hardcover in the 0-75ā <br />zone is now 21 percent. <br />Rahn noted the building pad is relatively small given the size of the lot. Rahn indicated he is inclined to <br />follow Staffs recommendations. Rahn stated if the garage is constructed over existing drivewry, there <br />would be no increase in hardcover. <br />Browne inquired whether rock is considered hardcover if there is no plastic underneath it. <br />Gafhon stated typically gravel that is compacted is considered hardcover and that decorative rock with no <br />plastic underneath is not considered hardcover. <br />Browne inquired what amount of hardcover would need to be removed <br />Curtis pointed out credit is not given for removal of plastic. <br />Browne indicated there is a row of rocks on top of the ground that helps outline the drop-off that has been <br />depicted on the survey as hardcover. <br />Curtis stated if the rocks serve as a wall or a border, it would be considered hardcover.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.