My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
05-23-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 8:51:07 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 8:40:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
McMillan stated she would like complete removal of the two docks. <br />Murphy inquired what the square footage would be for the shed, both platforms, and the gravel road. <br />Curtis stated the total would be 11 SO square feet. <br />Murphy moved, Pelersou seconded, to direct staff to draft a resolution for Application 10^7060, <br />litional useMichael and Donna Ebertx, 1220 Tonkawa Road, granting of an after-the-fact <c3j^t <br />permit in order to construct a boulder wall and re-grade the lalre^^f^, an^Jmtit^of a hardcover <br />variance subject to the removal of hardcover equivalent to thftpmonnt of hardcover added to the <br />site by the retaining wail, and ftirther subject to removal oftime existing ,4.5* by 10* shed and two <br />decks. <br />Ebertz staled those removals add up to applOxiHi^ely 3S0 squi^j^'and that in his view he is being <br />penalized. Ebertz noted one of the decks id Used on a^|uU^basidwd that the deck is one of the reasons <br />why he purchased the irfSpef^Ebertz noted the dec re-stimed in the past and is scheduled for <br />re-staining again in ^ near fumre. Ebertz stated jj^ould ratl^forego the retaining walls than removeu j <br />the deck. Ebertz st|llfihhere i^n expense an^iated with removing the deck and that the removal of the <br />deck wouj <br />noted a large poi <br />f.rj <br />llije.bfthI !f^. <br />'aware that boulders are no||yi)^gd in that area. <br />Whit^iuggested the road w removed, one deck, and the shed. White stated the runoff from the gravel <br />road is I ugger issue thai) runoff from the deck. <br />property is located within the 0-7Sā zone. Ebertz stated he was not <br />Ebertz stateQ|these iterM were on the property prior to when he purchased it and that in the future he <br />would like to exoado^lhe residence and at that time he would like to trade some of this hardcover for the <br />addition to the house. <br />Sansevere stated in his opinion the gravel road should be removed. <br />White stated when the applicant decider to add on to the residence in the future, he will not be allowed to <br />construct within the 0-7S' zone. <br />Murphy withdrew his moliou. <br />ā
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.