My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
05-23-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 8:51:07 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 8:40:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Moaday, May 9,2005 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(#05-3107 Scott Mma aad Mkhelle Morey, Continaed) <br />Marphy aiovcd to delete Rem No. 4 oa page tkree of tke remlatioa for the property located at <br />825 Toakawa Road, aad to direct Staff to IomH laagaage statiag that a permit caa be issaed for the <br />lake acccw italr aa Moa aa the appUcaata apply for a laad alteratloa pennit, aabject to the <br />coadMIoa that a letter be aabaatttH by the appUcaata ladkatlag their lateat to coastruct a hoaae oa <br />the property wHhia oae year. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. <br />Saaaevere awved, McMUIaa aecoaded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5324, a Resolatioa graatiag a <br />coaditioaal aae penait aad hardcover varlaace for the property located at 825 Toakawa Road, as <br />writtea. <br />Note stated he has been working with Curtis for approximately two months on this application and that <br />they have submitted everytfiing that has been requested. Nute indicated it is very frustrating for his <br />company to accept a down payment from a customer and have them scheduled to conunence work and to <br />not find out until the day of the Council meeting that the work will not be allowed to commence. Nute <br />stated that his company was forced to pass up other work because they were committed to this project. <br />McMillan noted the applicant is working with a tight time frame and that the project is not approved until <br />the Council adopts the resolution. <br />Bissen stated the only negative comment that was mentioned tonight was that the value of the property <br />might be increased fay this work. <br />Sansevere inquired whether this stairway project was ever discussed with Staff. <br />Nute stated when file project on the property to the south was commenced, the fact that a principal <br />structure wm required on the lot was never raised. Nute indicated at the time the work was started on that <br />property, the house was not framed. <br />Curtis stated at the time she visited that property with the City Engineer, the house was framed and up. <br />Curtis stated the recommendation was also contained on page one and page four of her previous report. <br />Gaffron stated it appears the applicant was given three to four weeks notice of the requirement for the <br />building permit. <br />VOTE: Ayca 4, Nays 1, Mnrpby opposed. <br />(Recess taken at 9:38 p.m. - 9:42 p.m.) <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REFORT <br />The Mayor/Council report follows Item 14A. <br />PAGE 19
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.