My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
05-09-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:06:22 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 8:39:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
h <br />i? <br />n <br />V <br />..FILE (P05-3106 <br />4 April 2005 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />Hardship Statcnent <br />Applicant has completed the Haidship Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />/m cmuUtriHt appUcaHomt for varianct, tke Ptaaatag Coaaalssioa shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance npon the health, srfetp and welfare of the connmnlty, existing and anticipated trpffic <br />conditions, Hghtandalr, danger tffire, risk to the pnhllc spfety, and the effect on values of property In <br />the surronntdng area. The Manning Commission shall consider reconanendlng approval for variances <br />ftam the lUer^ provisions of the Zoning Code In Inaanca where their strict enforcement would cause <br />undue hardship because of drcumstauees unique to the Individual property under consideration, and <br />shall recommend approval only when H Is demonstrated that such actions wUI be In beeping with the <br />spirit and Intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Staff finds that while the proposed porch addition will not increase the hardcover on the <br />property significantly, the structural coverage will increase and the nature of the <br />har^ver will change. <br />Issnes for Consideratioa <br />1. Are the changes proposed strictly aesthetic? <br />2. Does the size of the proposed open porch addition continue to contribute to the <br />overcrowding of the neighborhood? <br />3. Should the i^licants be permitted to construct to the 10* side setback line on the east <br />while there is only a 3.S* setback on the western side lot line? <br />4. Alt diere any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recomnicndatioa <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of a hardcover and structural coverage variance to <br />construct a minimal covered entry of SO s.f.. Additionally, Staff recommends removal of <br />the rock fire ring within 75* of the lake, and all fabric/plastic landscape liners. <br />Alternately, should the Planning Commission feel that the applicants* porch proposal is <br />reasonable; perhi^M in addition to the above listed hardcover removals additional <br />driveway hai^ver removals are warranted. <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.