Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Leslie stated the applicant could submit a different design if this application is tabled and not pay a new <br />application fee. <br />Winkey stated the council also has the option to table it and allow the applicants to redesign their plans <br />and send it back to the Planning Commission.ft-.. <br />Mr. Olson requested the Planning Commission vote on his applicatioitr A'^i^ r <br />Raha movedt Jargcas sccoadcd, to recommend appiWa] of AppBMtfoa '#05*3103, Jack aad Kari <br />V'-'— 'I- <br />OboB, 1966 Shadywood Road, subject Jo a redcsigB that would allow the naiiafum stractural <br />I* a'coverage of 1500 aqaare foot aad the associated miainuiljharacovcr allowed, aad fhrtbcr subject to <br />BO fhrthcr cacroachaieBtB into the aide setbacks. <br />Gafffon inquired whether this application should app^before the Planning Commission again if the <br />plans are revised. <br />Winkey inquired whether the application should be depiM <br />Rahn stated his issue with this appliei^Qn is me amount of structural coverage being proposed. <br />VOTE: Ayea 2, Nays 5; Frltileri keMipf, Bremer, Leslie and .Winkey opposed. MOTION <br />FAILED. % teM <br />Bremi^ to recoihmhnd approval of Applicattoa #05-3101, Jack aad Kari <br />4ia;;phj’<|K <br />Olto^lJ^i^ Shadywood Rc^i;ito^l&|ow a 20* by 20* detached garage subject to the proposed <br />haracoyef^rfdoctioBS in the appHea'its* revised plan. VOTE: Ayes 2, Nays 5; Raha, Jurgens, <br />’ I •!>1 <br />Kempf, Frl^fiiBd Winhey tipgdald. <br />Ai-4 <br />Winkey moved, Rahh secoil^, to recommend denial of Applicatioa #05-3103, Jack aad Kari <br />Oboa, 1966 Shadywood Rood, svUh the rccomawadatioa that any future proposal for a garage <br />conform with the 1500 structural coverage limit. Ayes 6, Nays 1; Bremer Opposed.