My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
05-09-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2023 9:06:22 AM
Creation date
1/12/2023 8:39:46 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
erosion problems which led to the landscaping originally. <br />Kellogg stated that the yard would need to be replanted with deep root plants, not grass, to contain <br />the hillside. <br />Bill Jackson, of Jackson Landscaping, stated that they had supplied the original owner with product <br />for his work. Jackson stated that he directed the previous hdmeowner to contact surveyors and the <br />city after he had gotten a stop work order in ordef' to proceed; He sbded that the homeowner had <br />4 -I * ' <br />supposedly gotten the necessary paperwork in order otxe he resumed work 2 months later and <br />hired Jackson to place the final boulders and revegetate the hillside. Jackson stated that, in his <br />opinion, if the boulders were removed, it would be a tdiigh hillside and slope to retain. He noted <br />that it is a good elevation from the building pad to the lake an4thid miich runoff would race down <br />the slope to the lake making it difficult to maintatfnwgetation on the slopeV <br />^4^ <br />Kellogg pointed out that the yard could/M'td^ded fidm thd^&lkw up to the house to obtain a <br />L./'• <br />; <br />3:1 slope. He felt the question was whether the Wanibbld’s and their neighbors would be better off <br />if the wall remained or was rem<>^..>. <br />r <br />m ■■ <br />' . 'j V ' ‘1 ■ <br />Rick Rusvold, Jackson Landsi^ihg, stated that the top boulders were placed to slow the water <br />before it hit the hillside. He staM that, previously, the water ran down the hillside like a rr.'cr <br />♦ <br />wiping the whoje bimide away. ' <br />stated that/n^rMnilU^he felt the citv ha <br />I * • <br />htur|)hy stated that, felt the city had compromised allowing the first 30’ of wall, and <br />,^iliiit iie did not have an isStie wiife the last IS* of boulders; however, he was concerned with the <br />• *..V <br />llic otW^C^Uncitmemben incurred.ouncii memnert eoii <br />Wambold clarifiM ttot.the lower portion of the wall could remain, while the upper be removed. <br />With regard to the patio, Wambold stated that he would like to keep a portion of the patio to <br />incorporate into a remodel. <br />Curtis stated that the allowance for the retaining walls would put the hardcover at the 75-250 ’ zone <br />at 26%. The patio would put hardcover at 29%. <br />.v_:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.