Laserfiche WebLink
:h <br />AnMIntiM SabmltlMl: December Z2,2004 <br />Incomplete Letter: Jmoary 4,2005 <br />Applkotleo Complete; Jonary 10,2005 <br />M-Day Review Eiplnthw (Site PUa): Marck 11,2005 - Eitendcd on M54I5 to 5-IIMI5 <br />120 Day Review Biplration (Snbdivlilon): May 20.2005 <br />C <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: March 11,2005 <br />Item No.: <br />Dqiartment Approval:Administrator Approval: <br />Name: Michael P. <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Title: Planning Director <br />Item Description: #05-3081 “Stonebay Lofts” - Outlot E, STONED AY (“2670 Kelley Parkway”) <br />Final Documents Review: <br />1) Resolution: Preliminary and Final Plat Approval <br />2) General Development Plan Approval for PUD No. 4B <br />3) PUD No. 4B Agreement and PUD/Development Contract <br />Application Status: At the February 28 meeting on a 5-0 vote Council directed staff to draft the <br />qipropriate ^yproval documents and resolutions, for review and adoption on March 14. Council also <br />indicatedaccqitanceoftherevisedparkingplan, acceptanceoftheproposal for asingle elevator, and <br />indicated that additional landsr^ing be added 1) between the front paridng lot and the road, peihaps a <br />hedge or all-season plantings to shield headlights; and 2) between the front parking lot entrance and the <br />southeasteriy units where headlights would potentially impact those units. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Revised Landacqie Plan - 3/9/05 <br />B - Sheets C2.3 and L2.1 from Original Stonebay Approval re: Berm Adjoining Public Works <br />C • Notice of Council Action 3-4-05 <br />D - Final Documents for Review and Discussion: <br />1) Resolution: Prelimiiuuy and Final Plat Approval <br />2) General Development Plan Approval for PUD No. 4B <br />3) PUD No. 4B Agreement and PUD/Development Contract <br />Revised Lmdscapiug Plau <br />^iplkants have submitted a revised landscqre plan that incorporates additional plantings at the southeast <br />comerofthebuildingandbetweenthepatkmglotandKelleyPaikway,parCouncirsdirection. Thenew <br />plan cuts in half (from 12 white spruces to 6) the additional screenin^buffering the Developer had earlier <br />proposed to supplement theberm vegetation next to the Public Works site. However, that siq>pl«nentai <br />screening vras in addition to the substantial screening (Exhibits B) required to be provided by the Stonebay <br />developerB,andthecunpentreduction8tiIlmorethanmeetsCoderequirement8. Council should review this <br />latest submittal and conclude whether it is acceptable; Staff recommends approval.