Laserfiche WebLink
»i4' <br />iO4.M10 <br />March 21,200S <br />Page 4 af4 <br />Other hardcover, consisting of driveway and new structure to accommodate an attached <br />garage and the driveway to serve it, a mud room, and study including the 2"** story above. <br />Total new structural coverage is 1,050 s.f. with a reduction in non>structural hardcover. <br />The Planning Commission should make a determination if non-structural hardcover <br />should be tradable for structural coverage in determining if a hardship exists to grant a <br />hardcover variance for an addition/remodel. <br />Staff finds that no hardcover should be permitted within the 0-75’ zone, with the <br />excqrtion of the necessary hardcover for an access to the lake. Staff recommends that all <br />0-75’ zone hardcover be removed. Should the q)plicant wish to keq> the existing stone <br />path located between the 944 contour and the lake as a means for access, which would be <br />accq)table a;: part of the building permit application and no variance is necessary as it is <br />allowable hardcover. <br />Should fiiis be considered a rebuild, the iqrplicant should be held to 25% hardcover within <br />the 75’-250’ zone and 0% within the (K75’ zone (with the exception of an allowable <br />access to the lake). <br />Past ApplicatkNU <br />Attached as Exhibit O, is an analysis of all rdjuilds that have occurred since 1999 to the <br />end of 2004. The lots which are similar to the ^licants in total lot area and 75’-250’ <br />area are outlined for your reference. <br />Staff RecoBUBCBilation <br />If die Planning Commission determines that the project is an addition/remodel and that <br />non-structural ha rdcover should be tradable for structural hardcover, then approve the <br />variance request for the 75’-250’ zone stipulating incorporation of additional hardcover <br />removals as noted in Exhibit F and engineer approval that the existing foundation can <br />support the proposed improvement, and deny the 0-75’ hardcover variance. <br />If the Planning Commission doesn’t wish to allow the trading of non-structural hardcover <br />fi)r structural hardcover, then deny die request or table and direct the applicant to reduce <br />die amount of structure proposed. <br />If die Planning Commission determines that the project should be reviewed as a rebuild, <br />then deny all variances as requested. <br />!- <br />*', <br />r. V ■ -r <br />I fi nrfl—4 Hi