My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
04-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:43:49 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 4:15:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M4-30I0 <br />March 21,200S <br />Pace2or4 <br />LiitofExhibiti <br />Exhibit A - Revised Survey <br />Exhibit B - Revised Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit C - Proposed Floor Plans <br />Exhibit D - Pressed Elevations <br />Exhibit E - Hardcover Removal Illustration per Submittal <br />Exhibit F - Additional Hardcover Removal Suggestions per Staff Recommendation <br />Exhibit G - Notice of Council Action dated 11-15-04 <br />Exhibit H - Planning Report dated August 12,2004 (most recent) <br />Exhibit I - Notice of PC Action dated 8-17-04 <br />Exhibit J - Notice of PC Action dated 6-22-04 <br />Exhibit K - Current 60-day Extension Letter <br />Exhibit L - Applicant Comments dated 11-30-04 <br />Exhibit M - 19^-2004 History of Rebuilds Approved <br />Background <br />The applicant originally submitted for hardcover variances within the 0-75 ’ and 75 ’-250 ’ <br />hardcover zones in order to construct a new residence on the existing lot. The applicant <br />appeared before the Planning Commission at the June and August 2004 meetings with <br />slightly different proposals both requiring hardcover variances. The Planning <br />Commission recommended denial of botti requests as the project was a rebuild and the lot <br />was conforming in lot area and width with no other valid hardships demonstrated. The <br />^)plicant moved forth to the City Council, where the application was tabled and the <br />Council directed the applicant to withdraw the hardcover variance request as it would not <br />be supported. <br />The original request also included a conditional use permit to grade within the 0-75 ’ <br />zone. The qrplicant has met with the City Engineer on site and has determined that the <br />level of grading necessary will not require approval of a conditional use permit and can <br />be approved in conjunction with the building permit. <br />Since the last meetings with the Planning Commission and Council the applicant has <br />hired a new architect and is proposing what he considers to be an addition/remodel as <br />opposed to a rd>uild. The improvements include the following: <br />• Existing fooforint and 1** floor rooms remain (living/great, dining, kitchen, porch) <br />• All existing outer walls remain <br />• Existing second story to be removed including floors/flrst story ceiling to <br />accommodate higher ceilings (existing ceiling are less than 8 ’) <br />• New second floor with 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms <br />• New attached 3 stall garage with mudroom/laundty and study <br />• New attic/storage space above proposed attached garage <br />• Demolition of existing 2-stall detached garage and driveway located at the street <br />The proposal meets all area and width requirements, setbacks, building height, and lot <br />coverage by structure standards.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.