My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
04-11-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:43:49 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 4:15:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
c <br />7. #05-3092 MATTHEW HOFFMAN, ON BEHALF OF CAMELOT CONSTRUCTION, <br />INC., 1225 DICKENSON STREET, VARIANCES, 7:22 p.m. - 7:30 p.ni. <br />Matthew Hoffman, Applicant, was present. <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting lot width, lot area, and a side street setback variance in order to <br />rebuild a new single-family residence on a property 135 feet side and .60 acre where 200 feet of width <br />and two acres are required. The applicant is requesting the side street setback variance to construct the <br /># V , <br />proposed home 35 feet from the side street where a 50-foot setback is required. <br />Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot area variance for a home rebuild on this property. <br />Additionally, if the Planning Commission finds the 50-foot side street setback requirement to be a <br />hardship for this property, a side street setback variance would be appropriate. <br />Curtis noted the proposed driveway curb cut is wider than 20 feet, which would have to be reduced to <br />20 feet or less.. ♦ <br />Hoffman indicated landscape plan has been revised and that the curb cut for the driveway has been <br />reduced. Hpffinan inquired whether he could have a 35-foot sdback rather than 30 feet from the street. <br />/ <br />Rahn inquired why the applicant is requesting the additional five feet. <br />^Hoffman indicated there are steep slopes in that area. Hoffman noted the existing residence is located <br />seven or eight feet ftom Keene Avenue. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Rahn commented he does not have a problem with this application with the 30-foot setback. <br />Bremer inquired whether the footprint would remain the same. <br />Hoffman indicated he is considering adding five feet to the house. <br />Rahn stated he would be opposed to adding to the existing footprint. Rahn stated the Planning <br />Commission has to deal with what is being proposed tonight and that the applicant could table his <br />application if he would like to redesign his plans. <br />■A ..A..- „ . ... ^ ------------------
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.