My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
04-25-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:15:00 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 3:42:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />f't <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Moaday, April 11,2005 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />(W4-3010 Ted Capra, Coatiaued) <br />Gundlach staled a letter was received indicating that a further review would be necessary. <br />White inquired what the age of the house is. <br />Gundlach stated the house was built in the I920’s. <br />Murphy inquired what the essence of the issue is with this application. <br />Gundlach stated the applicant did submit a number of different proposals, with the amount of hardcover <br />being requested varying. <br />McMillan inquired whether the proposed garage addition is two or three stalls. <br />Gundlach indicated the proposed garage would consist of three stalls. <br />Murphy inquired how the hardcover could be reduced to zero in the 0-7S’ zone. <br />Gimdlach indicated the applicant has agreed to remove a small shed, a stone path, and a small wall. <br />White inquired whether the wall is supporting the slope. <br />Gundlach stated the City Engineer did review that area and does not feel that wall is necessary to hold the <br />soil in place. Gundlach indicated the applicant is entitled to a stairway or other access to the lake. <br />McMillan noted more blacktop would be required with an attached garage but that in her view the <br />additional driveway is needed to safely access the lot. <br />Gundlach noted this property does not have a 2S0*-S00' zone. <br />Sansevere inquired why some of the Planning Commission tiKmbers felt this is a rebuild and nut a <br />remodel. <br />Rahn indicated he had the opinion that since the footprint is being almost doubled with the remodeling <br />project, it should be considered a rebuild. Rahn stated in his view homeowners should not be granted <br />additional hardcover simply because it is a remodel rather than a rebuild. <br />Alexander stated the proposed attached garage consists of 1,543 square feet and the existing square <br />footage of the house is 1,091 square feet. <br />Sansevere commented he views this as a remodel and that the applicant should not be penalized for <br />adding a garage. <br />PAGE 3 of 10 <br />( <br />—-a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.