My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
04-25-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:15:00 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 3:42:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />OftONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 11,2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.in. <br />V^te inquired whether the wall is supporting the slope. <br />Oundlach stated the City Engineer did review that area and does not feel that wall is necessary to hold the <br />soil in place. Gundlach indicated the applicant is entitled to a stairway or other access to tire lake. <br />McMillan noted more blacktop would be required with an attached garage but that in her view the <br />additional driveway is needed to safely access the lot. <br />Oundlach noted this property does not have a 2S0*-S00’ zone. <br />Sansevere inquired why some of the Platming Commission members felt this is a rebuild and not a <br />del. <br />Rahn indicated he had the opinion that since the footprint is being almost doubled with the remodeling <br />project, it should be considered a rebuild. Rahn stated in his view homeowners should not be granted <br />additional hardcover simply because it is a remodel rather than a rebuild. <br />Alexander stated the proposed attached garage consists of 1,543 square feet and the existing square <br />footage of the house is 1,091 square feet. <br />Sansevere commented he views this as a remodel and that the applicant should not be penalized for <br />adding a garage. <br />Gundlach stated there is currently nothing in the code that specifies whether this should be considered a <br />remodel or a rebuild. <br />Sansevere noted the applicant is utilizing the existing foundation and exterior walls. <br />Murphy pointed out the appearance of the structure is being totally changed with the remodeling project. <br />White stated the lots in the Casco Point area vary and that this lot has issues with access due to the <br />topography. White noted the applicant is proposing a 1,500 square foot house, which is not excessive. <br />McMillan noted some type of variance would be needed in order to attach the garage and construct an <br />adequate driveway. <br />Murphy stated the applicant is willing to remove some hardcover in the 0-75* zone and inquired whether <br />there would be any remaining hardcover in that area. <br />i*' <br />PAGE 4 <br />* <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.