Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />4 PmsoN A Pnaiu m <br />IP <br />MMUUiNiMAi. UMrnflt I jAHu rrr rMUrNMUiw <br />AmMNKVSMriAWr <br />loss MAirr WAY/ATA OOULVi <br />Sl'ITH.W <br />WAVlOVrA. MINNnSOTA s <br />JOHN H. nCMON <br />CHKiriOfHlWi. PieilSON <br />April 19,2005 <br />Mr. Mike Oaffion <br />Plumiiig Director <br />Chy ofOroito <br />P. O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bi^, MN 55323 <br />Lots 3,4,5.6,7 and 8, PLEASANT VIEW AT BAKE MINNETONKA (Big Island) <br />Lot Lina Reanangement <br />File No. 2461 <br />Request for Extension <br />DearkA. OalAoii: <br />B <br />ARD <br />J9I <br />TKI.KPHONK |VS3i 47.(-i<HKI <br />FArsiMii.r; i953» .n.MFiw <br />As you may recall, our film leprwenti the Biysons and Jdinaons in connection <br />suggestion of City Attorneywith the abovo»r afeianeed lot line ioana ngamant At <br />MRay Bland of the Hhuhaw A Culbertson firm, 1 anJsending you this letter to request <br />iimnally a O^nonth extension of aty CouncU Resoliions 5246 and 4794. <br />The original approval of this lot line reairangainent (Resolution 4794) was <br />ded by Resolution 5246 through April 22,2005 Id allow my clients to r^lve <br />various issues Ae title work disclosed. 1 have been wradng cooperatively with Mr. <br />Bland, my clianta. and Guaranty'nUe Insurance Comaany to resolve these issues. We <br />were iaAeproeeas of executing final documents in JBuaiy of this year when ono of the <br />titleholders became a patty to nunriage dissolution proceed ings. We could not proceod <br />with execution of the documents until either fiiose prtieeodings were completed or the <br />parties thereto resolved any competing clainu to the <br />is that such a resolution will be fbttiicoining soon, bn <br />ofthe lot line reanangement docum ents by toe April <br />not in ti«»e to complete execution <br />12 deadline. <br />In nwking this request fin an extension my cli <br />not obligated to grant this or any subsequent extensio <br />are iK>t completed by the new d^line, then the City <br />to toe matter. <br />nts understand tiuU (i) the City is <br />and (ii) if the City’s requirements <br />Its iu> obligation to consent further <br />C00/S00*i cosli Hm N0SV114 t NOSSSIi <br />|ect property. My understanding <br />«960 et.9 m 6»:9I 900Z.6r«SV <br />ii I ismmm 11 le