My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
04-25-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:15:00 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 3:42:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE <br />TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 78-1279 (6) <br />FILE NO. 05-3101 <br />WHEREAS, Jon H. Schwartzman and Jane Schwartzman, husband and <br />wife (hereinafter *Hhe applicants”) are the owners of the property located at 425 Oxford <br />Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the “City ”) and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 2, Block 1, Stielows Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br />(hereinafter the “property”); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has nuule application to the City of Orono for a <br />variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 (6) to allow construction of <br />an in-ground pool on the lake side of the home closer to the lake than the average <br />lakeahore setback, as determined by the adjacent homes. <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota: <br />FINDmGS <br />1. <br />2. <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File OS-3101. <br />The property is located in the LR - lA, Zoning District udiich requires a <br />minimum lot area of 2.0 acres and a minimum lot width of 200’. The <br />i^licant’s property is approximately 2.033 acres and 250’ in width at the <br />shoreline and 229’ in width at the 75’ setback. <br />3.The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br />held on April 18,2005 and recommended approval of the variance based <br />on the following findings: <br />a. The i^licant’s lot sits lower in elevation than the neighbor to the <br />south, who would potentially be most impacted. <br />Page 1 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.