My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
04-25-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:15:00 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 3:42:54 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r • <br />FILE #05-3092 <br />14 March 2005 <br />Paga3of4 <br />Hardcover CakalatioBi; <br />Hardcover Zone Total Area in <br />Zoae <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Extetiog <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />500-1000 27,086 s.f.9,480 s.f. <br />(35%) <br />2,186 s.f.* <br />(8%) <br />5,616 s.f. <br />(20.7 %) <br />After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />Lot Area and Lot Width Variances <br />The applicants’ property is the result of the combination of 4 - 50’x 135’ lots with a total <br />area of 27,086 s.f. and lot width of 135’ where 87,120 s.f. in area and 200’ of width is <br />required. These variances are required to rebuild any home on this property. <br />Side Street Setback Variance <br />The applicants have proposed a 40’x 65’ home situated with the front door facing <br />Dickinson Street and the garage accessing off of Keene Avenue. This proposal meets the <br />50’ front and rear yard setbacks as well as the 30’ side yard setback. However the <br />proposed house does not meet the required 50’ side street setback rather is proposed to be <br />located at 35’from the side street property line and 52.5’ from the traveled right-of-way. <br />Additioruliy, the curb cut of the driveway is not permitted at a width greater than 20’ at <br />the street. The driveway as proposed would need to be reduced at the curb. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />/n eomMUttU^ appHcaHom for vortonce, Ike PtomiiHg Commtahn shell consider the effect of Ike <br />prepeoed rorlence npon Ike keohk, spfety end welfore of Ike community, existing and anticipated traffic <br />conditions, llgkt and air, danger of fire, risk to Ike public safety, on values of property In <br />the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances <br />from Ike Utera! provisions of the Zoning Code In Instances where their strict enforcement would cause <br />undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the Individual property under consideration, and <br />shall recommend approval only when It Is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the <br />spirit and Intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Staff finds that there is hardship to justify granting the lot area and lot width variances as <br />the property is a small lot, similar to the rest of the lots in the immediate small lot <br />neighborhood located within a 2-acre zoning district. Regarding the side street setback <br />variance, should the Planning Commission And that due to orientation of the property, the <br />immediate neighborhood, and the nature of the dead end side street there is hardship <br />Justifying a 35’ side street setback a variance may be warranted. <br />Issues for Considcnition <br />Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.