Laserfiche WebLink
Dale Application Received: 2>14-0S <br />Date Application Coneidered at Complete: 3-14-05 <br />60-Day Review Period Expiree: 5-14-OS <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />APft 2 5 2005 <br />CITY OF OHONO <br />Date: April 22,2005 <br />Item No.: /(D <br />Depnrtment Approval:Administrator Approval: <br />Name: Janice Gundlach^ <br />Title: City Planner <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #05-3089, Theodore & Debroah Rozcboom, 2967 Casro Point Road <br />Variance - Resolution <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />LR - 1C, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (Vz acre minimum) <br />0.48 acres (20,936 s.f.) <br />82’ @ shoreline, 76 ’ @ 75 ’ setback <br />LIstofEihibits <br />A - Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendaticn <br />B - PC Action Notice 4-19-05 <br />C - Memo to PC dated 4-14-05 <br />D - PC Memo and Exhibits of 4-11-05 <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order io constru.;t an <br />addition to the street side of the home connecting to the existing detached garage: <br />1. Hardcover variance for the 250’-500’ zone to permit 54% when 30% is normally allowed <br />and 64.4% currently exists. <br />2. Average lakeshore setback variance tc -ermit the existing het tub to be relocated to the <br />roof of the lake side enclosed porch, wt . currently encroaches on the average lakeshore <br />setback. <br />3. Side yard setback variance to permit a side yard setback of 5.5 ’ when 10’ is normally <br />required and 5.5 ’ currently exists in order to allow the garage to become attached, rather <br />than detached. <br />At the Planning Commission meeting the applicant again revised his request and eliminated tlie <br />proposed addition that would have made the detached garage become attached to the house. In <br />doing this the applicant eliminated the need for variance #3 noted above. However, the applicant <br />proposed a new roof overhang to run along the street side of the house meeting the required 10’ <br />setback to the side lot line. This proposed roof would require approval of a new variance to permit a <br />S’ separation between the new roof attached to the house and the detached garage when 10’ is <br />normally required. <br />7: <br />tiiahiiihili