Laserfiche WebLink
(V0S>3M6 1145 Sixth Avenue Nortk <br />February 18,2005 <br />Page 2 <br />Pertinent Code Sections <br />Section 78-1279(2): Required minimum structure setback from top of bluff = BO*. <br />Section 78-1279(3): Bluii impact zones. Structures and accessory facilities, except stairways, landings, <br />and loek boxes, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. <br />Section 78-1286(e)6,7,8: <br />6. Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope. <br />7. Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by the City Engineer <br />for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of 30% or greater. <br />8. Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones. <br />Section 78-967(bX3): Proposed elevation changes within 5' of a lot line, except for drainage swales and <br />ditches, are considered as ‘unusual land alterations’ requring a conditional use permit. <br />Summary of Request <br />Applicants have purchased this property and plan to remu ve the ex isting house and detached garage in <br />order to construct a new residence with attached garage. <br />This is a unique site, with signi ficant topograpliic limitations. The buildable area is within a 3-acre triangle <br />of land including southerly and northeasterly facing bluffs and steep slopes rising from the shore of Long <br />Lake. The applicants share an existing driveway which also serves two neighboring homes on the higli <br />ground to the inunediate west. The site is heavily forested. <br />The existing house, garage and driveway apron extend to the defined top of bluff, with no setback fix)m <br />(and even some slight encroachment into) the bluff itself. The proposed new residence has been located <br />to generally be further fix>m the top of tlie bluff than the existing house, but constraints of driveway slope <br />and tree locations limit developability of the site for the home design proposed. The applicants arc <br />requesting top ofbluffsetback variances for a small portion ofproposed deck, and for the attached garage; <br />approvals are also required for restoration ofgradcs after the existing house is removed, as well as minor <br />grading to accomplish foundation construction and drainageways within the ‘bluff impact zone’, i.e. witliin <br />20* of the defined top ofbluff. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />m <br />f <br />coHsMeiirng •Homs for vmrioMce, the PioMoiog CommissioM sHoU consider the effect of the proposed <br />vmtimmee upon the ,»th, smfety omd welfare of the community, existing and unticiputed truffle conditions, iight <br />end uir, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and Ihe effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The <br />Hanning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the Uterai provisions of the <br />Zoning Code in Instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances <br />nnigne to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br />lemonstrated that such acHons will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />n <br />i <br />. S