My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2005
>
03-28-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:07:34 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 3:39:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />OKONO PLANNINC: COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 15,2004 <br />6:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />(MH-3066 WILLIAM AND ANITA ROUSE, CONTINUED) <br />Rouse indicated he is willing to reduce the hardcover in the 0-75’ zone consisting of five square feet of <br />plastic and 26 square feet of wood borders. In the 7S-2SO’ setback, 466 square feet of concrete would be <br />removed, in addition to some rock and plastic and another 108 square feet of riKk borders. Rouse <br />indicated almost 1000 square feet of hardcover would Ik* removed as part of this project. Rouse stated he <br />is looking at putting approximately 200 square feet of stepping stones from the garage to the house. <br />Rouse indicated those reductions would lower the hardcover from 39.3 percent to 33.8 percent. Rouse <br />noted his hardcover calculations do include the plastic underlayment. <br />! <br />I <br />Kahn stated in his view the u4iole lakeside wall is going to be reconstructed and nut much is going to be <br />remaining but the cap of the structure and 16 lineal feet of eight-foot wall. Rahn inquired whether the <br />City has passed any ordinances relating to dcicrminulion of renKidet versus rebuild. <br />Gaflrun staled the ordinances are still in the discussion stage, (iaffron indicated applicants arc told that if <br />nuirc than 50 |K*rcent of the existing value of the Ih>usc is renMived, that SlatThas In l<K)k at it as a rebuild <br />and not a reiiHHlcl. (iaffron stated there is some ambiguity in determining the value and 50 percent. <br />Kou.se slated he has received four bids and in none of the bids do the walls come down. <br />Kahn inquired whether the layout of the first lliMir would change. <br />Rouse stated some of the internal walls would cliangc as far as the layout itself, with the load bearing <br />walls remaining. <br />Kahn stated the C'lty should require demolition plans to give Staff a licller idea of what is being removed. <br />Rahn commented in his opinion Uie majonty ol the intenor walls would be removed as well as increasing <br />the height. <br />Rouse slated the older area ol the house consists basically of a small batliroom, a smalt bedroom, and a <br />small eating area, which are basically one room. Rouse indicated there arc no intenor walls in that area. <br />I'lil/lci iiu|uired whether the balhrtMiin would reniuiri. <br />Kouse indicated the bathruuin would nut remain. <br />rrii/ler stated in lus opinion tlie bump out wall could disappear. <br />Rouse slated there arc m» plans to change the outside structure, with all llic exterior walls remaining. <br />Kahn staled the addition of the lieaders would change the outside of llie structure. <br />Rouse stated the sliding gloss doors exist today. <br />ft;PAGE 24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.