Laserfiche WebLink
MINl'TKSOFTIIK. <br />ORONO PI.ANNINC; f’OMIVIISSION MKI.TING <br />IVIonday. March 21, 2005 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Kahn noted in pnor silualums where the rouiidaliuii is (|iicstu)nable the riannin^' (’ommission has <br />ic(|(iiied llic upplieanl u» ic-up|K*ar lH*f«*re the Planning (’onimission, <br />(Jailrun indicated that was not part ot the discussion on tins application ami it was not im oi|»oiaied into <br />the resoliilion <br />Jurgens inquired whether a basement is lieing constructed. <br />(iumllach indicated it woiilii leniain ciawl space. <br />< i.iltion staled a |Miiiion ol the foundation wus con.sttuclcd in 19K4. which is in goml sI u|k.'. hut the <br />portion of the loiindation coiistiucled in the eaily 1‘MlOs is the section that has deteriorated. <br />Raliti inquired what the required stihack is. <br />('urtl.s inthcaletl the sliect setback is .15 feel and that the garage was leviewed as a Side yard setbaek, <br />which IS 10 feel <br />(iatlroii noted thcie W’us anothei situali'.in within the City wheie a property owner had removed <br />everytlnng hut the haseinenl and the cap, which ended up being more than 50 |K-icenl of the lesidence. <br />(iaitfon stated in that instance it was better to remove alt the walls ralhei than to try to preserve the <br />walls. <br />Rahn inquired whether the cap is remaining on this house <br />f iallion staled the stud walls on the main llooi aiv remaining hut that Uie tloor and the tloor Joists have <br />hern lemovrd above Uic dctenoratcd foundation (iallion iiHlicalcd the cuiieni ceding would also lie <br />removed. <br />Rahn mquiied how much of the foundation \\a.S eX|H».scd at llu' nine this application was reviewed by <br />the Planning ('oinmissioti. <br />Ilicmci noted die pictiiies ate Ironi ihr inside ol tlic crawl space. <br />Jurgens stated it appears from the picluies that the iound.ition had I htii sealed on the oijisidp. <br />PACiE 2