03-28-2005 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

^VUU AAA O «/•• A «/AV# U 03/21/2003 09:16 16124011629 I. ttuut IVaMCMI.uux AppUc #05-3085 Mu-cli3l.M0S ^•celorz itc AppUcaUon ftecolvidt I-IS^IS P«tfi Application Couildered u Conplete: 2-7-05 60-D*y Review Perl«Ml Ixpireii 4-6-OS To;Cluiir iuhii and Plara»lng CommiHoioo Menibcro Ron MoorsB, City Adminietrator Rrom: Janice GundUch, City PlanserJ^ Date:March 17,2005 Subject:05-3085, Julie Kreslins on behalf of Jul Ann Inc. and Building Owner Aleck Overeon, 3455 Shoreline Drive, Commctcial Site Plan Review, Public Hearing Zoning DUtrict; Lpt Area! Lot Width: B -1, Kntail Sales Business District (20,000 s.f. minimum) 0.953 acres (41.521 s.f.) . 185 feet (lOO* lequiied) Application Summary: Applicant requests a commercial ilte plan review hi order to obtain an occupancy and/or building permit for property located at 3455 Shoreline Drive. The applicant# are proposing to convert an existing back-side lower level vacant apace into a beauty ahop/salon. which is a permitted use under the B -1 zoning district. 5ta/J^ Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Plaiming Commisaion discus# the mgress and egress agreement and the shared parking agreement submitted by the applicants in makiiig a recommendation to the City Council en this use._____________________ At the February Planning Commission meeting this application was tabled to allow the applicants to work on a more acceptable parking arrangement that would not require variances and to confinu whether legal access exists to tlic rear of the bujlding. LlstofBxblbUs Exhibit A - Existing Ingres# & Egress Agreement Exhibit B -Proposed Parking Space License Agiccmcnt Exhibit C - PC Action Notice dated 2-23-05 Exhibit D - PC Report dated 2-17-05 F.xUUug Ingress A Egress Agreement Mr. Keeveny, the adjoiniirg property owner to the oast, has submitted a copy of his Title and an associated document which coofirmo that access to the lower level of the applicant’s site does BxisL Tlic language of document #1176635, noted on the Title, permits this ingress and egress only for the “ownwa and tcuants (but not the business invitees)”. The language of the proposed Parking Space License Agi'oonient, attached as Exhibit B, grants ttre right to use a •imitctl lumber of parking spaces to Jul Ann’s, but does not appear to grant access over the Keaveny property to Jul Ann’s business invitees, which would seem to be a cntical tutssing element. Staff is concerned tlu»t tliis document will not be recorded against the clraiu of title on cither property and its permanence is also a concem. . JC ^ {PUr- *<//// )4»