Laserfiche WebLink
► <br />Dale Application Received: 12-19-04 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 12-19-04 <br />60-l)ay Review Period Espires: 2-19-05 esieiided to 4-18-05 <br />MAR 2 6 20Ub <br />Cl IY Or <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL AC'i ION <br />Date: Marcli 23, 2005 <br />Item No.: )/ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Janice Gundlach^ <br />Title: Cily Planner <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #05-3080, Intcrspacc-Wcst, Inc., 2060 Wayzata Boulevard West <br />General Concept Plan Approval - Resolution <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />B - 6, iiighway Connnercial District <br />l*UD, Planned Unit Development <br />2.637 acres (1 14,868 s.f.) <br />191 feet <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Notice of Council Action dated 3-15-05 <br />B - Resolution per Council and Planning Commission recommendations <br />Application Summary: 'fhe applicant is requesting the following in order to construct 10 units <br />(potential for 20) of office condos on 10 lots and tnie common lot to be known as Amber <br />Woods Office Centre: <br />1. B - 6 IHJD General Concept Plan approval, <br />2. Preliminary Plat approval in order to create 10 units lots and one common lot, <br />Tlic applicants have proposed development of 10 units (with the potci'tia! of 20) of office <br />condos on approximately 2.6 acres located at 2060 Wayzata Boulevanl West. The proposed <br />condos will be 2-story walkouts containing appro.xnnately 34,186 s.f of gross .square footage. <br />Rach building will contain a walk-out level, a main lloor level and a second story mezzanine. <br />Approval of this project will first rei|uire General Concept Plan approval. Preliminary Plat <br />approval and Commercial Site Plan approval, followed by General Development Plan, <br />F•asemcnt Vacation, and Final Plat approvals and an amendment to PUD Agreement No. 2A. <br />Attached as Exhibit B is the ('oncept Plan Approval Resolution incorporating the Council <br />recommendations as noted in the previous 3 meetings, as well as the Planning Commission’s <br />recommendations from the January Planning Commission mcciing.