Laserfiche WebLink
riic PliiiiningConimissjon furtlicr recommended that the iicwdormcis meet tlic lO-foot side <br />setback. <br />■| lie ii|)|)licniits are also proposing to remove the shed from the adjacent lot and place it on the slab <br />next to llic garage. I he applicants would reduce the si/e of the slab next to the garage to <br />aecommorlale the shed with a small apron. Curtis noted the applicants in the fiiturc would like to <br />replace the existing loof on the garage to match the house, and at that time would be willing to <br />remove the shed and remaining slab. The applicants are also fuithcr proposing to remove the <br />play structure Irom the adjacent lot and relocate it in the garden near the front door of the <br />lesidence. In addition, they arc proposing to remove the excess sidewalk. <br />Stair Iccis that the excess structure of the shed and the hardcover associated with it is not justified <br />by a hanlship. .Since there is not an appropriate or conforming site for the shed to be relocated, <br />.Staff would not be supportive of this request. <br />Curlis stated the driveway is also an issue for the applicants. The adjacent neighbor utdizes a <br />portion of the applicants* driveway when he has guests. Illc driveway cxisteil prior to the <br />applicants owning the property, with the ap|)licants feeling that the neighbor would drive through <br />their yard and park on their lawn. Tlio applicants are requesting that the driveway remain to <br />accommodate the neighbor. Stuff recognizes the unirpie situation at the street side of the <br />. 'applicants* property, as it is used by the public and the ncighlioring property owner, and therefore <br />Stuff would support the driveway parking area as it exists. <br />' , J ■ <br />Sansevero inquired whether the applicant is in agreement with Staff on the shed. <br />I <br />t <br />Christe'isen state ! storage is an issue for them at the present time and that it would be nice to be <br />ttblo to keep the shed during con.stiuction on the house (’lui.stenseu noted he would In* willing to <br />Itmove the shcil and the slab once the lesidence is completed. <br />Murphy inqtiired whether the applicants arc considering changing the footpiiut on the garage in <br />the future. <br />('hrislen.sen staled they are not.