My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2005 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
03-28-2005 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2023 4:07:34 PM
Creation date
1/11/2023 3:39:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TIfE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETLNC <br />Monday, Marck 14,2005 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />(#05-3081 7M C'on»truction, Inc., C'onlinucd) <br />(iaffron sUiial lK*f«)rc Ihc Council tonight is a resolution giving preliminary and final plat approval, <br />general development plan approval for I’UI) No. 4li, and HUU No. 4H Agreement and l‘lJI)/I)evelopment <br />('ontract. Ciaffron stated (he City does re(|uiic mylars prior to finul plat approval, noting that the county <br />has not yet approved those, (ialfron furthei noted that release of this pr«>jcct would not happen until all <br />as|K*cts of the pioject have Inren completed. <br />fiallton noted the documenls have been provided to the City Attorney for his review. <br />Barrett indicated he does have a few minor ettmments but that (here ate no sul>siantial changes to the <br />documents. <br />McMillan ini|iiiicd whether StaH feels time uic any issues that the Council should discuss. <br />(iaffron stated individuals would be purchasing and owning .sepaiale units, with a common micresi <br />community plat lK*ing developed that descrilKs and cieales the individual ownerships, (iaffron stated the <br />City IS not involved m that as|iecl of this project, (iafiron noletl there would also lie bylaws and <br />covenants for tins development, which tlic City would be reviewing. <br />McMillan recommended that |>otential purchasers lie infonned that there is a public works building <br />adjacent to tins lot and that there is the possibility for noise. <br />/aclinian indicated |iotential purchasers would l)c informed of that as well as the fact that there would be <br />offices across the street. <br />McMillan inquired what type of lighting would be on the building. <br />/aclinian staled they would Ik * inslallmg a (»fl-walt bulb on each of the decks, a light over tJie entrance to <br />the garage ami the fire ihnirs, and a chandelier in the front entryway. <br />White inquited whether the deck lights would Ik * downcast. <br />/uclinian staled the lights would w«>rk «)ff a switch and woulti Ik * an e.xtertor ty|K* light <br />McMillan inquired whctlier any liglitmg along the sidewalk was being planned. <br />Zaehman sialeil they have not discussed Uuit. <br />McMillan sug,gesietl Ihc applicant eonsidrr installing low voltage lighting along the sidewalk. <br />/uchnian indicated be wdu KI Ik * w illing to incoipotale the low voltage liglilmg along (he sidewalk. <br />White suggested the applicant consider utili/ing 15-watt bulbs lather than (»n wall bulbs on the decks. <br />Zai lmian stated they do currently utilize 15-wall bulbs in (lie hallways. <br />pa(;e 14 <br />.-Jteiili iRh A ri ir
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.