Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 < <br />I <br />ii <br />4. <br />5. <br />a. No increase in hardcover in cillier the 0-75’ or 75 ’-250 ’ zone results <br />with the proposed improvements. <br />b. A net reduction of 502 s.f. in the 0-75* zone results with the revised <br />proposal. <br />c. A net reduction of 286 s.f. in the 75 ’-250* zone results with the revised <br />proposal. <br />d. The most lakeward wall, setback 68’ when 75 ’ is required, is being <br />rebuilt due to rot and will be located in the same locution tlius not <br />encroaching any further on the required 75 ’ setback. <br />e. 11)c property is situated on a point where almost the entire lot is <br />lakeward of the defined average lakcshore setback line but where the <br />orientation of the existing residences and proposed addition will have <br />no new impacts on lake views enjoyed by nciglibohng property <br />owners. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendation of the Planning Commi.ssion, reports by City staff, <br />conmicnts by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br />variances on the health, safety and welfare of the connnunity. <br />I'he City Council fnuls that the conditions existing on this property are <br />peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br />district; that granting the variances would nut adversely atfect traffic <br />conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br />pro|)eriy; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is nece.s.sary to <br />prc.serve a substantial property right of the ajiplicanls; and would be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Coinprchcnsive <br />Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 6